|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:29 PM Original message |
I guess I'm gonna run for President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. Got my vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. Where's your birth certificate??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Got the genuine article right here, but that won't matter to the dumbasses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
3. The president can't make anything a... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Yes Zorra can !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Deleted message |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Please explain how Obama could... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backwoodsbob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
46. of course you can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. Vote Zorra! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. 2 votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
75. 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. "The state of the Union is awesome!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Yeah, thanks, well, Lebowski should get most of the credit for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. 3 Votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. You'd throw Bernie Sanders out? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
37. Actually Bernie would make a good VP, and he could show Zorra around. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coyote_Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
53. If there is a name on my Dem primary ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
12. Vote for FSogol instead, I promise talking llamas and waffles will now be part of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
13. Show me what you can accomplish at a lower office first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. There's no time for that, so please just vote for whoever you like, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RegieRocker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. It is time to elect someone through the power of the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. That's very refreshing, and it seems so simple and good. The dark forces would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Very refreshing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
49. Oh lighten up shirley. . . . .n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Well, can't hurt to try. Most they could do is shoot me, (or cause my plane to crash?), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. Give it a shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chef Eric (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. What party? Democratic? A third party? Independent? Inquring minds want to know. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Well, if Dems nominated me, I would run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. Aren't "Executive Orders" only used for dictating policy/action within the "executive" branch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. National Security. Hard to dispute that. SCOTUS would legislate against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Since the Supreme Court is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:21 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Can't rule against a Constitutional Amendment. Only way to beat SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. You're ignoring separation of powers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
45. Not ordering SCOTUS to do anything. They'll simply have to rule on the EO's. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
25. This is hysterical... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Well, would you explain to me exactly how this would be a dictatorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Of course it's not funny to you - you like having Obama in charge. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. I happen to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. It's a joke, dude, but I totally meant it when I said she couldn't do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. forget it TBF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Yes. I clearly mentioned the "approval" of Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Remember FDR's court-packing plan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. So, I take it you think FDR was a dictator? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:46 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. Quite honestly, in reality, the intent of this post is as serious as it ever gets. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Is the question about how it would be a dictatorship... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Yes. I'm sorry, but you seem to be side-stepping the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Goodluck with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #47 |
55. For starters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:28 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. It really is a matter of national security. SCOTUS can decide if my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:35 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Please provide the section of the Constitution that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. There is none. But President's issue EO's all the time. SCOTUS overturned a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:02 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. I'm not the one that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
31. Almost forgot. We could probably get a whole lot of Anonymous help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
35. I doubt you could do much worse - I'd vote for you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
40. Good idea, just don't become corrupt and give away the bank |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
41. "with the cooperation of Congress, of course" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Autumn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. This part should take care of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:09 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. I'd vote for him on that alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. BTW, it's "her", just FYI, not that it makes any difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Oops...egg on my face!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. No problem, dude! Let's go get a beer. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
58. All three EOs violate separation of powers and one the bill of rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. SCOTUS would say so. But Presidents "legislate" with EO's quite often. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Please give a specific example n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:54 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Nah, look it up. It's easy. Actually. Prez Obama's order to attack Libya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:56 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. That wasn't legislation.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:09 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Look, this was fun, but I don't have time to explain EO's, something that is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:11 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Yeah.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. "Congress may rule at some point that the order was illegal." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:15 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. Dude, listen, don't believe me. Read the War Powers Act and it will explain it to you, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:20 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. The War Powers Act is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SDuderstadt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Not before being impeached and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Modern_Matthew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
73. Be our dictator. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC