WASHINGTON (Reuters) - There is no technical reason that the crisis at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant will slow down relicensing of U.S. nuclear reactors, a top official from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said on Tuesday.
Rather, the NRC will assess any changes required in light of the disaster and make changes immediately, outside the licensing process, Bill Borchardt, the regulator's head of operations, said at a Senate energy committee hearing.
http://www.fox43.com/news/nationworld/sns-rt-usreport-us-japan-utre72s451-20110329,0,1560084.storyI saw a brief snip of the hearing today.
Reduce the number of rods in the fuel pool on top of the reactors? Nah, the biggest danger is from newly extracted fuel rods and a complete redesign is too costly.
Increase the battery capacity in case of station blackout? Nah, the kind of "common mode" failure that hit Japan will never hit us. Besides, we have regional backup generators that can drive to any reactor in trouble.
Heavy sigh....
But there will be a report. And there will be recommendations. But here's what the Union of Concerned Scientists have to say:
If the past three decades have demonstrated anything, it’s that the NRC will likely come up with a solid action plan to address problems revealed at Fukushima, but will be glacially slow in implementing those identified safety upgrades. A comprehensive action plan does little to protect Americans until its goals are achieved. We urge the US Congress to force the NRC to not merely chart a course to a safer place, but actually reach that destination as soon as possible.
http://allthingsnuclear.org/