Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Japan crisis to not slow relicensing U.S. plants: NRC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:54 PM
Original message
Japan crisis to not slow relicensing U.S. plants: NRC
Edited on Tue Mar-29-11 04:55 PM by Junkdrawer

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - There is no technical reason that the crisis at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant will slow down relicensing of U.S. nuclear reactors, a top official from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said on Tuesday.

Rather, the NRC will assess any changes required in light of the disaster and make changes immediately, outside the licensing process, Bill Borchardt, the regulator's head of operations, said at a Senate energy committee hearing.


http://www.fox43.com/news/nationworld/sns-rt-usreport-us-japan-utre72s451-20110329,0,1560084.story

I saw a brief snip of the hearing today.

Reduce the number of rods in the fuel pool on top of the reactors? Nah, the biggest danger is from newly extracted fuel rods and a complete redesign is too costly.

Increase the battery capacity in case of station blackout? Nah, the kind of "common mode" failure that hit Japan will never hit us. Besides, we have regional backup generators that can drive to any reactor in trouble.

Heavy sigh....

But there will be a report. And there will be recommendations. But here's what the Union of Concerned Scientists have to say:


If the past three decades have demonstrated anything, it’s that the NRC will likely come up with a solid action plan to address problems revealed at Fukushima, but will be glacially slow in implementing those identified safety upgrades. A comprehensive action plan does little to protect Americans until its goals are achieved. We urge the US Congress to force the NRC to not merely chart a course to a safer place, but actually reach that destination as soon as possible.


http://allthingsnuclear.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. An open-ended recommendation list, with no action plan or timeline.
Sounds great! x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I suppose the only thing that could make them change business as usual would be a lot of pressure
from the public. Who knows if that will materialize or if it would actually make any difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now tha this crisis has proven the American public's capability to believe
Edited on Tue Mar-29-11 04:58 PM by truedelphi
that radiation dispersed world wide from nuclear reactors using mox fuel is "safe" and that the bombs in Libya are of more interest, I guess they can keep on keeping on with the damn things.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. And there it is.
We won't learn.

La la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Proceed with caution" is for wussies
As soon as the shuttle Challenger exploded in flight NASA should have simply built an exact copy immediately, without taking any time to examine flaws.

Failures should never slow any project.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. 3 times a charm. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC