Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Iowa we are fighting about smoking in casinos and the leg. is fearful that people will go to IL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:13 PM
Original message
In Iowa we are fighting about smoking in casinos and the leg. is fearful that people will go to IL
Edited on Tue Mar-29-11 05:15 PM by Skidmore
to gamble if there is a ban because people just won't sit for hours cranking those one-armed bandits, chucking their hard earned cash away a nickel at a time.

Now let's talk about the most pernicious form of taxation out there--state run gambling. It is a tax from which some is rebated to those who can hit the right numbers. The prospect of a possible payout attracts those who hope to hit the big jackpot. We know people who will take every spare bit of cash they have and hit the casino. If the states want to tax people they should be honest about it and spread the pain. An additonal note of disgust to add to this is that quite often the gambling addiction program is among the first to be targeted in budget cut discussions. How craven is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. IL banned it too...
at Jumers in Rock Island theres a smoking lounge....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. The casinos should be the ones
funding the addiction programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have no problem with voluntary "sin" taxes
I pay some for beer. Smokers pay them. Gamblers can do it too. All of them can be abused and considered addictive, but all are 100% voluntary and non-essential. You have to decide whether any recreation is worth the cost, and I would rather the profits go to the state than individual owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC