|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:24 PM Original message |
Japan mulls draping fabric over reactors: report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Since "this never could happen" they have to write the playbook as they flub along. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. They have gone from the desperate stage to the stupid stage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Except I think it is still too hot, the concrete won't set. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. yeah, there is some reason it's too soon for bury the reactors in concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. It is no hotter than Chernobyl was when they buried it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. It's Still Fissioning. They Can't Entomb it While It's Fissioning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Worse, without the constant stream of cooling water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-30-11 02:40 AM Response to Reply #2 |
22. I read that that would be difficult because the spent rods |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Make it a Cristo project! Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newest Reality (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. We must gather together and send them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 11:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. +1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-30-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
21. Good ole "duck and cover" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. Oh, Gawd.. I thought this was a Cristo stunt via the Onion.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Or would the fabric keep out prying eyes?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. good point n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 11:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Bingo. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lutherj (788 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. Gives new meaning to "throwing in the towel". nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
16. Oh please, oh please, oh please - let it be pink taffeta! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-11 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
17. Funeral drapes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-30-11 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
18. Umm...who's going to be operating that tanker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-30-11 01:17 AM Response to Original message |
19. what they need is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-30-11 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
20. Just had a horrific thought... what if the core burns into the areas containing the water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC