Well Michele Balkman is on record.

[rwork]

As of the Today Show this morning. If she were President she would never entervene in another country because of humanitarion reasons.

[TheCowsCameHome]

1. I presume she means outside of Minnesota.

:rofl:

[truebrit71]

2. How 'christian' of her...

:puke:

[TxVietVet]

3. No wonder they call her "batshit crazy".

I hope she and palin head up the conservanazi ticket. :rofl:

[chelsea0011]

4. Hell, she doesn't want top intervene in the USA for humanitarian reasons.

[Marblehead]

5. blah,blah,blah

[H2O Man]

6. She lacks

the essential qualities to be truly human; thus, it is impossible for her to grasp the meaning of "humanitarian."

[CrownPrinceBandar]

7. And the scary thing is........

that no matter how repugnant what they say is, they will always find an audience for their spew.

[Siouxmealso]

8. The problem with the Obama Doctrine

is how do you explain away Darfur?

[Viking12]

11. There is no 'Obama Doctrine'. That's just something made up by the media.

I don't support this action. There are many reasons to oppose it. However, stupid arguments built on this rhetorical fiction called the 'Obama Doctrine' are not included in that group.

[immoderate]

9. She's broken.

--imm

[opihimoimoi]

10. I guess she woulda let Hitler capture Britain without help ??

[liberal N proud]

12. Republican values only allow invasions in cases where there is profit

[SeattleVet]

13. She is, as usual, confused.

Someone needs to tell her that 'humanitarian' is really not the same sort of thing as 'vegetarian', but with people.