Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is radiation in the US milk harmful???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:25 PM
Original message
Is radiation in the US milk harmful???
Edited on Thu Mar-31-11 12:38 PM by CoffeeCat
The Wall Street Journal is reporting that traces of radiation - in the form of
iodine 131 - have been found in the milk supply in Washington State. The Journal also
reports that these levels are low and that there is nothing to worry about.

"The Environmental Protection Agency said a March 25 sample of milk produced in the Spokane, Wash., area contained a 0.8 pico curies per literlevel of iodine-131, which it said was less than one five-thousandth of the safety safety guideline set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration." http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703806304...

HOWEVER, look at this interesting information which suggests that iodine-131 (which is from the
Japanese plant) is not a naturally occurring substance. Furthermore, if ingested can "emit"
radiation in the body and rest in the thyroid and other organs, causing grave damage."

"But cesium-137 and radioactive iodine - the two main radioactive substances being spewed by the leaking Japanese nuclear plants - are not naturally-occurring substances, and can become powerful internal emitters which can cause tremendous damage to the health of people who are unfortunate enough to breathe in even a particle of the substances , or ingest them in food or water. Unlike low-levels of radioactive potassium found in bananas - which our bodies have adapted to over many years - cesium-137 and iodine 131 are brand new, and very dangerous.
http://projectpangaia.blogspot.com/2011/03/comparing-ja...

BY THE WAY, HAS THE MEDIA OR ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY TESTED FOR OR REPORTED ON CESIUM-137 LEVELS IN MILK OR IN THE AIR?

--This sounds incredibly harmful! It sounds like the media's suggestion that "we are exposed to
radiation daily!" meme is bunk. Yes, we are exposed to radiation--"external emitters" that hit
the outside of our body. Or small doses of potassium iodine in bananas--which are bodies have
adapted to. However, the iodine 131 in the milk appears to be incredibly harmful and
an "internal emitter" that travels around in your body and collects there, causing cancer and
other life-threatening damage.

It's very difficult to try and hash all of this out! It appears that if radiation (iodine 131 from the
Japanese plant) is in our milk--that people can be harmed, and even killed by post-exposure cancer.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. It hasn't hurt me at all - WHOA! BIG DOG! BIG DOG! I'm totally normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. When I add bananas to my plutonium flakes they sparkle - is this normal? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Good thing about plutonium flakes is if you combine more than a cup, you can have hot cereal
w/o using your stove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is a good idea
to carefully distinguish the difference in meaning between radiation and radioactivity. There is a key element in that distinction that could be applied to other information we are getting that, intentionally or unintentionally, conflates the two.

Our problem, and the danger, is with radioactivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. ugh
can't afford that boxed milk that some people here are excited about so I guess if I must drink it, it will be soy or almond milk. Actually I kind of like the almond milk anyway but I do feel for families and kids. That's a family staple and adjusting to the alternatives or taking a risk and just drinking milk is not a fun choice for parents to make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know! What choices am I supposed to make...
Edited on Thu Mar-31-11 12:42 PM by CoffeeCat
...as a parent?

Most people stand around, waiting for instructions from the government. That's not a good idea, in
this day and age?

This sounds really bad. The more facts I read, the more dangerous this sounds. I've got kids!

If I stop buying milk--then I'm a paranoid ninny. If I don't and my kids or my family is harmed--well
then I'm a damned fool for doing nothing!

F'n A! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I know what you mean...
I've decided to err on the side of being a paranoid ninny. My son doesn't really drink milk anyway. But my daughter loves the stuff like I do and will ofter just drink a big glass vs eating at all. We're not gonna buy anymore until there is a lot more information made available....and maybe not then even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. you are in Buyer Beware Murka
there is nobody looking after the consumer much, so it's not crazy or paranoid to wonder about the milk IMO. Anybody who stands around waiting for instructions from the govt is probably dreaming, having flashbacks to those balmy days of Smokey the Bear.

Are the farmers going to take geiger counters to the milk? I doubt it, because then they couldn't sell it. Nobody's requiring it, so the milk will be sold. There is no such thing as honor or ethics here.

My advice--do what makes you feel best. I would put kids on milk alternatives for awhile, and adults could slack off a bit. If you err on the side of safety, so what? It will make you feel better and the children will learn new food sources.

Yeah I understand the :mad: We are powerless pigs at the end of a very big trough. WHY should we be worrying about radioactive poisons in our food? Nobody has a good answer for that. It's just "consumer beware."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. If the radioactivity is a concern, then you are no better off with soy or almond milk
Soybean plants and almond trees use the same water as the blades of grass those cows are eating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's what I've been thinking too......
The radiation plumes from Japan are in the jet stream, no?
It's washed out and falls as rain on plants, right?
I don't see any way to avoid ingesting this stuff unless you have food/liquid that was produced prior to this catastrophe.
FUBAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. good points.
no tap water, no milk, no soy/almond milk.... jeez...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. powdered milk?
is that ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. if it was powdered before the cows it came from ate the radioactive grass, sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Radioactive iodine has a short half-life, so you could buy the powdered milk
Edited on Thu Mar-31-11 04:14 PM by gkhouston
and wait. It wouldn't spoil in its powdered form. I use it to bake bread and buy the big boxes because they're cheaper. I dump the box in a plastic container for easy access and use it for months with no noticeable degradation. I do try to keep it away from light, though.

We don't appear to have reached the point where this is necessary (and it's not clear to me that we will reach that point), but I believe that you could buy "contaminated" powdered or shelf-stable milk and wait about 10 days, if the only thing of concern is iodine. If the problem is some other radioactive element, we're probably already so fucked it's not going to matter what you're drinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. We get ours from Smith Brothers in Kent, WA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, actually, radiation in the milk is good for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Lemme guess...
...the milk will give me a nice warm, healthy glow?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Only if it glows blue


When high velocity particles travel faster than the speed of light...

What is Cerenkov radiation?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Its perfectly safe,,and economical,,no need to pasteurize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. The levels of radiation aren't harmful
Edited on Thu Mar-31-11 04:05 PM by Cali_Democrat
At least that's what the media told me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ratty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-31-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Don't worry about being a ninny
Why live with the stress? No matter what people tell you some anxiety is likely to creep in and with a family to take care of and trying to do what's right by your kids, do you need any MORE stress nowdays? Look at it as an experiment. Give up dairy for a month and see if you notice changes in mood or health in you or your family. Many people have minor allergies they aren't even aware of. I decided to give up dairy for a couple of months awhile back. I held my nose and ordered soy milk in my lattes and was surprised that I liked it. It wasn't nasty or gooky or saliva-ey like I had feared. Turns out I didn't feel a whit different so I went back to regular milk.

So try some soy milk, and I heard almond milk is pretty good too. Tell your family it's a grand experiment and use that as an excuse not to worry so much. Tempt them with promises of almond milk ice cream or non-dairy sorbet if you have to. I think all milk drinkers should give it up for a while at least once in their life, just to learn how it affects their body. Why not channel your anxiety into something constructive?

FWIW I'm a huge milk drinker and go through a half gallon every couple of days. I'm not concerned about the vanishingly small quantities detected here - the Homeland Security detectors they use to detect underground nuclear tests anywhere in the world are exquisitely sensitive (then again, I wouldn't get within ten feet of a glass of milk if I lived in Japan).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC