Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It seems many around here have forgotten

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
reggaehead Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:36 AM
Original message
It seems many around here have forgotten
how Presedential politics works. Which is understandable given the 8 years of the Bush Dictatorship. The idea is a simple one. In the first term you run to the middle. The second term is where you build your legacy. Obama's re-election is the most important thing that will happen in the world during the next 2 years. Do you really want a Supreme Court with another Scalia or Thomas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bullshit.
Another four years of Obama is going to give us corporatism on steroids.

No thanks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No thanks?
WTF are you going to do??

I really gotta hear this...or read it......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well at least we know it won't be a hazardous dose of socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. America will be better with Mittens or Sarah
am I right or am I right?

:sarcasm: for the humor impaired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. It will probably be Mittens
Edited on Tue Apr-05-11 11:04 AM by avaistheone1
and he unfortunately he is not all that different than Obama.


Remember Obama modeled his health care plan on Mittens' plan - which is Obama's signature piece of legislation.

Cute, we call romney Mittens, and do they call Obama, Obomba?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nope, un uh, not buying it. More threats and Bull Shit
He should have done some "legacy building" in lieu of more nation building. He should have shown us what he's made of this time around and set back to see if we want more of the same.

What, no 3-D chess arguments about a "master plan" that we're too dumb to get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow...
"Obama's re-election is the most important thing that will happen in the world during the next 2 years."

You know, personally, I'm voting for him. I've pointed out numerous times that, disappointed as I may be, I'll vote for him because he's not as bad as the other side.

Still, your ability to predict the future and judge the most important event in the world.... frankly I'm in shock. I was unaware we had psychics that powerful right here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ummmm......No
FDR left a legacy in 100 days - which he built on for the remainder of his time in office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. His approval rating is higher than Clinton's and Reagan's
were at the same period of their administrations. I don't think he has to worry about the DU doom and gloom contingent here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robdogbucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. So, how goes things in Michigan?
Are you still hoping that good faith "negotiations," are appropriate in the situation Michigan citizens/labor now finds itself in there?

What are you doing to stop the bagger gov you elected?

Didn't see your name on the Michigan state forum, telling everyone what you are doing for labor in Michigan.

Are you in the streets every day, or are you just waiting to negotiate in nice springtime weather?

Good luck to all Michiganders, you will need it.



On, Wisconsin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. If his approval ratings are so high, please explain the 2010 elections. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why don't you give us some history to illustrate your point?
My recollection is the heavy lifting is done early, for the most part and the second term is lame duckitude, selling a legacy, and making deals to benefit those with deep pockets.

I think your point misses the mark, unless you are going back to FDR and he was elected four times and had to keep earning votes rather than strategically placing himself for speaking tours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Well I remember back to JFK and I think either it had to get done
in the first 100 days (the honeymoon) or it waited until the 2nd term. And the 2nd term only if the president was lucky enough to have a congress with a workable majority. I think it has happened both ways in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Like Reagan? Bush? Clinton? FDR?
nope, nope, nope and nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. So you vote for a president in the Hope that half his time in office he won't be completely
against you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm shocked that many believe we can just pul;l a switcheroo.
They think if we tell the country to ignore our 2008 choice and get behind a new dandidate, the Republicans will let it go. As if we won't have to hear how Democrats can't be trusted ever again or that we're demanding a "true socialist" to replace Obama.

I know a lot of the malcontents are those who supported other candidates back then, but the alternative to Obama 2012 is a Republican White House for decades, and that's a reality. Dems were steamed about Clinton's work with Gingrich on such things as welfare reform and such, but we didn't try to pull him in '96. As I recall, it got so bad that Gore wouldn't be seen with Clinton in his 1999 campaign, but we didn't turn our back on him.

I know where this is going. Many of those who feel disallusioned will stay home in November 2012 in a stereotypical Democratic hissy fit leaving us to scratch our collective heads wondering how this guy ever got in a position to blow the corporate class for the next eight years:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Well, I will not be staying home
in November 2012. And I will not be voting Republican. If there is a Democratic candidate that I like better than Obama, I will vote for him or her. Bot otherwise, Obama will get my vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. That's good news.
My other fear for 2012 is that half of us will decide to vote for someone like the Democrat's favorite vote splitter, Ralph Nader, to stand up to Obama and show him that he's not the only date in town.

In that case, the Republicans can count on us to make way for a Koch brother in a cabinet post because they won't waver on voting for the party nominee. If they're faced with a candidate they don't like, they'll just hold their noses while they enter the booth to punch the hole for the "R" and rid the White house of what they consider a blight on the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. "It's only been four years"
UNREC. Did you think we haven't heard this particular song and dance before, with a slightly different beat last time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. What sort of simple minded twaddle is this?
Politics is not physics and it is not predictable and there are no rules that it must obey except the Constitution and the law, and we tend to ignore even those freely these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Wow, I see there has been a brand new enforcer army sent out --
"Get the hell in line, soldier!" :eyes:

Sorry, you can't scare me any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Same argument I've been making here for ten years.
Each year I make it, things get worse.

Think I'm done with that argument for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. hope for more change?? nah. I'm done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Clinton moved to the RIGHT in his second term. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. No doubt and if and when it happens again, I think we recall the talking point
"It is for the future electability of the party" and "we must be a viable alternative to the Republicans for "moderate" voters".

Which means this bus is headin' Reich to avoid the Reich circular logic that screws the poor and workers aka most folks in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC