WI - Prosser VICTORY FUND??? WTF???

[Lefta Dissenter]

http://www.justiceprosser.com/

Screen shot, just in case he yanks it:


The Prosser Victory Fund
We Need Your Support
After a challenging battle in which a historic number of votes were cast in a Supreme Court race, we need your help in preserving a victory for Justice David Prosser. The likely next step is a recount, requiring resources to protect the integrity of the ballots cast and deliver a win. Please take a moment to contribute, with your help a victory in this hard-fought battle is within reach!

Click Here To Donate

What the HELL is he doing?

YOU LOST, YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE! What do you need MONEY for??? The STATE pays for the recount when the margin is this slim. WHAT DOES MONEY HAVE TO DO WITH THIS????? WHO ARE YOU GOING TO BUY OFF NEXT??? :mad:

[vercetti2021]

1. Seems like

He wants to bag as much cash before he gets the boot in the ass. That or finding ways to cheat the recount.

[Old and In the Way]

5. He publicly referred to the Chief Justice as a bitch - she'll be appointing the judge to oversee it.

I don't expect her to cut this guy or his legal team a whole lot of breaks.

[Webster Green]

2. Lawyering up.

SOP. He won't pull it.

[Old and In the Way]

3. The arrogance of Republicanism is breathtaking.

And to think this guy could ever be an impartial judge.

[murielm99]

4. Write letters to the editor.

Send it to all your union friends. This needs publicity.

[highplainsdem]

6. I'd like to know what "resources to protect the integrity of the ballots" is supposed to mean.

Do they want to hire little Scotty Walker's favorite Wackenhut guards to "protect" the ballots?

[Confusious]

11. Means he's going to sue until the money runs out. nt

[highplainsdem]

7. Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller is saying "election experts" are questioning the results and alleging

fraud.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/07/election-fraud-allegations-fly-in-close-wisconsin-supreme-court-race/


It was inevitable that Prosser would demand a recount. And the Kochs (whose front groups paid for many of his ads) can easily afford an army of lawyers. But apparently they'd like their gullible followers to pick up as much of the tab as possible.

And one way to motivate them to contribute is to try to convince them there was vote fraud.

But that isn't the only reason we'll be seeing more stories like the one in the Daily Caller. The Kochs and GOP would like to smear and discredit Kloppenburg and her supporters, even if Prosser doesn't win the recount.

[travelingtypist]

8. Luntz.

Has to be.

[Kablooie]

9. A recount to PRESERVE his VICTORY? Huh?

[Rex]

10. Soreloserman account.

[Siouxmealso]

12. Loser pays

I heard on the teevee last night that recounts in Wisconsin are paid for by the challenging candidate.

[Lefta Dissenter]

13. not if the difference

is within .5%