|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:04 PM Original message |
Anybody else dubious of GOP claims that they found 7000 votes in a heavily GOP county in WI? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. 14,000 with a net gain of 8k for Prosser. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes, of course, they have a proven track record of cheating in elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
socialist_n_TN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
3. Of course I'm dubious. That's not the question....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. The machines should be impounded immediately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtbymark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. The new results are on the Clerks Personal computer, and she's not letting anyone see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestate10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. She will have the computer taken away from her by laws. Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. No modern day republican is honest enough to do that. I hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestate10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Altered electronic records do not go away. If the woman altered vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Unfortunately the Obama WH and the Justice Dept are probably not dubious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. This is a state matter yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Obama shouldn't meddle in state matters... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Didn't stop the Bush Justice Dept from meddling in the Alabama gov election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. I agree... posted a thread earlier that this is looking ALOT like Alabama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. I'll never expect the same bullshit from the Obama admin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. yeah.... Only all Union Rights are on the Fucking Line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. I disagree while the election was a state matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. He can't start the fire though.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drale (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. But its the people in the state government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. Apparently the count tapes and the machine counts didn't match. This raised the warning flag for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. Hopefully, the Sec of Stae in Wisconsin is dubious enough to force a full audit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
12. Fox News reported--one whole town did not turn in their votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestate10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. And there are fewer people in the town than voted. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Not true. Brookfield pop is ~40k. 14,135 votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. Inaccurate. The town did, the county clerk missed adding them to totals submitted to media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
13. Duh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
15. Do the voters there have to sign the rolls on election day? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
37. we have to in Floriduh, and show picture i.d. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeepItReal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. We have to sign by our names on the roll in Cali. No ID needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toddwv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
18. Smells REALLY fishy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. That was an interesting and significant read. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
21. I'd love to know who has had possession of the voting machines post election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
23. dubious is an understatement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
25. "Dubious"? I'd use a much stronger term than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Logical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. Sounds really odd to me. Don't trust them! n-t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LawnKorn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
28. The Republicans are cheating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LawnKorn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
30. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. Deleted message |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. I'd have to say the clerk was probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
38. Waukesha County to audit election equipment Aug. 18, 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
39. Any one read the Kos post yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
41. Anyone who isn't dubious has not been paying attention the last 30 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-08-11 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
42. Pretty much everyone is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC