Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The White House Blog: Details of the Bipartisan Budget Deal -- posted this evening

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 06:40 PM
Original message
The White House Blog: Details of the Bipartisan Budget Deal -- posted this evening
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 06:41 PM by highplainsdem
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/09/details-bipartisan-budget-deal

The White House Blog
Details of the Bipartisan Budget Deal
Posted by Dan Pfeiffer on April 09, 2011 at 06:44 PM EDT

Last night, President Obama announced that the federal government will remain open for business because Americans from different beliefs came together, put politics aside, and met the expectations of the American people. Today, small businesses will no longer worry or have to wait on a loan to open or expand their business, families will receive the mortgages they applied for, and hundreds of thousands of government workers, including our brave men and women in uniform, will continue to receive paychecks on time.

This deal cuts spending by $78.5 billion from the President’s FY 2011 Budget request -- the largest annual spending cut in our history. These are real cuts that will save taxpayers money and have a real impact. Many will be painful, and are to programs that we support, but the fiscal situation is such that we have to act.

The two sides agreed to cut $13 billion from funding for programs at the Departments of Labor, Education, and Health and Human Services as well as over $1 billion in a cut across non-defense agencies, forcing everyone to tighten their belt. There will be reductions to housing assistance programs and some health care programs along with $8 billion in cuts to our budget for State and Foreign Operations. These significant cuts to the State Department and foreign assistance will mean we will not meet some of the ambitious goals set for the nation in the President’s Budget.

Our team also went after wasteful spending and earmarked, special interest programs including $630 million in earmarked transportation projects and at least $2.5 billion in transportation funding that is ready to be earmarked. We were able to cut $35 million by ending the Crop Insurance Good Performance Rebate, which gives successful farmers, who have no claims, a rebate for insurance premiums already subsidized by the federal government. In addition to these cuts, we were able to eliminate $30 million for a job training program that was narrowly targeted at certain student loan processors. We also looked to the Defense department for savings, and were able to identify $18 billion in cuts deemed unnecessary by the Pentagon. These types of cuts are what the American people expect out of their leaders in Washington.

-snip-



Please read the full blog post for all the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. what fucking dog shit spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Reuters article on details here: "Details of deal reached to keep US government running"
FACTBOX-Details of deal reached to keep US government running
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/09/usa-budget-idUSN0727284120110409

You can compare the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ridiculous
Where's the spin?

Via Greg Sargent

<...>

UPDATE: A Democrat emails the Dem perspective on the wins they secured:

1) $17 BILLION IN CHIMPS -- WE SPREAD OUT THE CUTS ACROSS OTHER PARTS OF THE BUDGET. We insisted that meeting in the middle on cuts would require looking beyond domestic discretionary spending—and we prevailed. More than half—or $17 billion—of the final round of spending cuts came from changes in mandatory programs, or CHIMPs. The emphasis on this part of the budget staved off severe cuts to key domestic programs like education, clean energy, and medical research.

2.) $3B IN PENTAGON SAVINGS -- WE PROVED DoD WASTE SHOULD NOT BE SPARED. We won the argument that waste at the Pentagon should not be immune from spending cuts. The final agreement eliminates nearly $3 billion in unnecessary Pentagon spending that was contained in H.R. 1. These reductions are supported by Secretary Gates.

3) TITLE X PRESERVED -- WE FOUGHT OFF ATTACKS ON WOMEN’S HEALTH. We fended off their highest priority among the riders by nixing their proposal to gut Title X funds that provide cancer screenings and other preventative health services for women. The Republicans’ overreach on this rider in the final days dramatically weakened their hand.



FACTBOX-Details of deal reached to keep US government running


<...>

Changes in mandatory spending, or "CHIMPs" in Washington-speak, minimize the impact of the spending cuts in future budget cycles because they do not lower the baseline levels for discretionary programs such as space exploration or housing, whose funding levels are set by Congress each year.

<...>

Most of the federal budget is beyond the reach of the annual budget process. The size of benefit programs such as Social Security is determined by how many people qualify for them, not by how much money Congress sets aside for them.

Democrats pushed for cuts from mandatory programs, although they exempted the Big Three -- Social Security, the Medicare health plan for retirees, and the Medicaid plan for the poor.

The largest of the remaining entitlement programs: $4.9 billion from a Justice Department fund for crime victims; $400 million from a fund to seize assets from organized crime; and roughly $550 million from the SMART Grant student-aid program.

Republicans wanted most of the cuts to come from discretionary programs that Congress reviews annually, because that would set a lower baseline for spending in future years.

<...>


Less pain as iffy spending cuts dot bipartisan budget pact

Almost half of the budget cuts, some $18 billion, in the budget pact between President Barack Obama don’t involve cuts to agency operating accounts spending hawks like to target. They involve cuts to so-called mandatory programs whose budgets run mostly on autopilot. Such cuts officially “score” as savings that could be used to pay for spending elsewhere, but they often have little real impact in terms of cutting the deficit.

They include:

—$2.5 billion in leftover highway money unavailable under current budget caps.

—$500 million from reforms to the Pell Grant program.

—$3.5 billion in unused Children’s Health Insurance Program funds.

—$5 billion in “phantom” savings from capping payments from a Justice Department trust fund for crime victims. Under arcane budget rules, appropriators can claim year after year the full amount of money in the trust fund.

—$400 million in similar savings from capping a Treasury fund to help pay for the department’s crime-fighting efforts.

—$2.2 billion in cuts to subsidies for health care cooperatives.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Rah rah. Change we can make believe in.
I'm glad I haven't decided to defend everything Obama does, no matter what. You must enjoy a challenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. You must embrace the cuts.
Or at least Obama will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. "earmarked transportation projects"? whose earmarks are those I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. "There will be reductions to housing assistance programs"
I hope this doesn't mean I am going to end up on the streets again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. wow...farmers get paid even if they have no claim and are
subsidized up front from the government..so...getting money on both ends....I need to be a farmer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think you have to be a corporate farmer
to cash in on that deal. Individual citizens need not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC