Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't hate democrats. I don't think they're as bad as repubs, but

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:55 AM
Original message
I don't hate democrats. I don't think they're as bad as repubs, but
I am frustrated and fearful. I'm frustrated by their lack of fighting spirit inability to frame the debates, as well as the corporate mindset of too many of them. I'm fearful that they will continue participating in the dismantling of the social net in order to "save it".

I'm fearful that out of party unity, few elected dems will really buck the President and will continue to allow him to set the democratic agenda. And let's face it, the agenda he's setting runs counter to many democratic values.

I'm so tired of feeling ill, day after day, when I hear what the dems have accepted, endorsed, not fought against. I wouldn't mind losing so much if there was at least a good fight against the repukes.

But there isn't.

Yours in discouragement,

cali
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's understandable...
At the very least, put up an argument. Present a message worthy of a national Party. Simply rolling over is not acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Presiding over the death of the New Deal.
Now there is a legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. more like lackeys to those presiding over the death of the new deal
ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. The problem is how do you defend spending when the country is in debt?
The only area we feel like cutting is defense and getting into Libya makes that impossible.

Taxes will go up with the expiration of the Bush cuts so to me fighting for higher taxes is moot. The expiration will pit tax receipts close to the 20% we have traditionally been at. Now we need to figure out how to cut spending to 20% of GDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. baloney. there are plenty of places to cut- yes, defense
but many more. How about the billions and billions in subsidies for oil companies or agribusiness. And as for the supposed expiration of the bush tax cuts, I have a lovely bridge to sell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Aren't those tax credits? They aren't cutting spending, they are raising revenue.
If the govt gives you an exemption for your mortgage interest payments that is not an expense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. Tax reveue can be applied to the debt.
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 09:57 AM by bahrbearian
You can give it any name you want, but it still is simple math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. It increases revenue.
The question is if you have spending that is constantly growing will you keep on increasing taxation? At what point does everyone acknowledge that the spending is too much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Do you really think the Bush taxcuts will be permitted to expire?
That is gold to the Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Like this last time they will automatically expire.
I think any serious person who looks at the budget has to let them expire. Either that or they will do as Obama wants and revamp the whole thing.

But it will be obvious by then that the increases are necessary and that we need all of them, not simply for the top 2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The bush tax cuts are going to expire like the last time??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. There was sound reasoning for not increasing taxes in a recession.
The plan was that they would be reinstated after we had recovered.

Unless you think we will still be in a recession, the rationale for keeping them isn't there unless spending is cut to a level that doesn't require more income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Does that also take into account that you don't lower
taxes when you are at war??

This country follows no sane economic policy. It is feed by emotion and agenda.
The majority of the people passing laws that the bottom lives with have no idea what it takes to live in this country when the President considers $172,000 a modest salary.

A teacher makes $50,000 and is said to be making too much, the one that has the power to shape young minds.
And a man that goes out and talks to the press after he has been fed the words he is suppose to say. He makes $172,000 and his boss says he can understand why he wants to go out in the real world and make more money. Tell me what is wrong with this picture.

The top is out of touch with the bottom and they do not care.

You tax the money. How many jobs have been created through all these tax cuts for the top?? I do not see any.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Suggestion
Whatever you think of Michael Moore, I suggest you consider the central theme of his speech in Wisconsin.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/america-is-not-broke

America is NOT broke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. We traditionally have tax receipts at 20% of GDP. That is where spending and taxation need to be.
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 09:35 AM by dkf
Now if you want to debate the composition of who pays, that is legitimate. Then it becomes a political food fight.

But the easy path to raising revenue is to let the Bush tax cuts expire. Anything other than that needs to pass the House and Senate and get to the President and you know how impossible that will be.

And if Michael Moore honestly thinks the House as composed now will just raise taxes on the rich and keep and grow a safety net then I've got a bridge to sell him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Long past food fights
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Michael Moore should be president.
He's been right about everything ever since I've been following him. The fact that the HC Ins. Corps spend millions trying to discredit him, looking for anything, gossip on his family, whatever, shows how right he is.

If he ran, for Congress, or anything, I would support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. The country has been in debt since 1789.
There is no justification for the draconian cuts. HUGE DEFICITS DIDNT MATTER from 2001-2008, why was that? HUGE DEFICITS DIDNT MATTER from 1981 - 1992, WHAT A COINKYDINK!

Fuck that framing and fuck everyone who regurgitates it.

GIGANTIC TAX CUTS that primarily benefited the MASSIVELY WEALTHY caused the current HUGE DEFICIT. The solution is to RESCIND THOSE FUCKING TAX CUTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Huge debts don't matter until they matter.
I'm sure too many individuals have found that out the hard way.

The problem is that with insolvency or debt problems, once one person cuts you off, the others will too and then it's a feeding frenzy to pull apart your carcass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. but it getting much bigger of late to the point of actuallly mattering.. see graph below..


I dont think any legitimate economist would say those numbers dont matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. You start by not letting the people who gave trillions away in tax cuts give you lectures
...about fiscal responsibility. Republicans are GETTING AWAY with sounding like they care about the deficit when they cut trillions in revenue and then advocate cutting billions in spending.

The OLD Democratic agenda, you know the one where we weren't advocating cuts in services but weren't giving away tax cuts to the rich also, THAT agenda generated 10 times less red ink than the Republican/ Tea Party one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Frankly what I see is that no one party is interested in fiscal responsibility.
We only talk about it when we have divided government.

Democrats will always want more spending for the poor and a larger safety net for everyone, Republicans will always want less taxation on everyone especially the rich. That leads to spending under Democrats and reduction in revenue under Republicans, which gets us to where we are now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. We've pretty much always been in debt. There are some relatively simple
fixes but they must be coupled with harder social choices. Tax the wealthy. End the Wars. Problem solved. But we must also vow to take care of the vast majority of our citizens and stop coddling the One Percenters. We might have to build government factories to put people to work building things that will actually be used in constructive ways. These things are being done elsewhere in the world. If we don't follow these examples we are boned. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. GO WHERE THE MONEY IS.
The rich and the megacorporations are LOADED.

I'd put all my energy into getting our money back from them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
20. I think you just spoke for the majority of DUers.
Thank you. :hug:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
25. "continue participating in the dismantling of the social net"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marsis Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
26. Rats all
Neither party has the interests of the average person on their agenda. Why do the Dems cave? Because we are not part of their agenda. As with most things, follow the money and you'll see where their hearts are.
A far as I'm concerned, it seems we have to go with the weird uncle that just beats us as opposed to the uncle that rapes us. So we have to choose the lesser of two evils but it is a lose lose situation for the average person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
28. I don't hate either Democrats or Republicans but I am beginning to dislike ...
all politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. It is better to FIGHT and Lose.
When the Dem Leadership "compromises" (surrenders) in the spirit of Bi-Partisanship, and then declares "Victory",
they then OWN the outcome.

If they FIGHT and Lose, and the public sees them FIGHT,
then Republicans OWN the outcome.

One of the WORST outcomes from the HCR "compromise" is that the Democratic Party did not force the Republicans to accept ANY responsibility for the disaster. In 2014, when 50 Million (80Million?) Americans are forced to BUY junk Health Insurance they can't afford to use,
ALL the Republicans have to do is sit back and say, "Yep. We voted against it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. A-men.
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'm guessing if you were one of the people...
personally effected by all these draconian cuts, you wouldn't have a problem saying you hate the democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
35. Cali, thank you for stating your opinion in a classy manner. I feel the same as you. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC