|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:38 AM Original message |
Some on DU claim that Manning ONLY released video of warcrime and not other material. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. OK, so what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:53 AM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Perhaps, but what does the law say regarding this matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. The laws are there to support justice for all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Who decides how the law changes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 09:19 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. You mean in a FUNCTIONING democracy? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 09:23 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. I mean in a constitution republic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 01:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. You wanna talk about Law? Okay, which law? The law of man? or the law of God? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 09:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Manning was required to obey the laws of the United States of America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 09:28 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. I know it is a crazy concept. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Here is where all rational reasoning falls apart: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 04:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. I guess that President Obama hasn't yet ordered the military to stop enforcing laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. Uh, Mr Stubbs, the military does not exist to enforce laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. They could do both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #28 |
51. I see both as true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
48. Why does that section of 18 US Code exist then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. Some people say..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
3. I could be wrong, but I suspect what people may be distinguishing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. Pentagon Papers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. The 150,000+ documents had nothing to do with "war conduct". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. That would be 250,000+... which deal with imperial conduct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Perhaps by your definitions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 01:01 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. And as if "war conduct" is the only nefarious conduct our government engages in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
8. Thanks for posting this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RandomThoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
13. Interesting metaphor. Function not data. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamuti Lotus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
14. the content of those documents is, in itself, indefensible behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 06:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
23. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. K&R...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
16. Manning's actions may be indefensible. A court will decide, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 02:17 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. dont recall him being in any court rm recently, just the hole while drones kill civilians and those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanpalmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
18. Is obtaining "infonnation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
52. (probably a scan from a print copy) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 04:26 AM Response to Original message |
19. Indefensible in your opinion. In mine the wars that the criminals are perpetrating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanpalmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 04:35 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 06:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Manning is a courageous whistleblower. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lamp_shade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 05:52 AM Response to Original message |
21. Rec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
29. Gov't lying to its citizens such that they and others die is indefensible. Let's punish that FIRST. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
30. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
31. Deleted message |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Pathetic personal attack. Isn't that against DU rules? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 12:14 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Yeah, but a lot of times it means they have a good handle on things as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-10 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
34. Unrec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
35. This is pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
37. I'm not sure how we can survive with him being free. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 05:12 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. And tortured. Don't forget he must be tortured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
40. There is no rule of law in the U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
41. People .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msanthrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
42. Manning gave a foreign entity access to SIPRNET--access, not a 'leak.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
43. "A government official in another country has already been charged with treason from the results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 07:46 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. It has only happened in the same way that Assange has been charged with treason... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
44. oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-30-10 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
46. The joke is.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
50. It is the duty of those who are sworn to defend the constitution to report these crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharksBreath (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:39 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. LOL Who was the last President to uphold the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
54. He's a a real skeery danger to 'Murka!! He threatens us with Knowledge!! Eeek!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-31-10 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
55. bushco goes free, banksters and financialists go free, drones continue adding up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC