Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Using analysis from the Congressional Budget Office

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:06 PM
Original message
Using analysis from the Congressional Budget Office
So much for the self proclaimed fiscal conservative's trickle-down bullshit.


Money well spent
Josh Bivens
April 7, 2011

Many Republican federal budget proposals assert that tax breaks for the wealthy and for large corporations, combined with reduced safety net spending, will grow the economy. The Figure, from a new EPI briefing paper, Abandoning What Works, shows the folly in that logic. Using analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, the figure shows the stimulus, or yield, of $1 spent in different ways. It shows that direct federal spending and infrastructure, and spending on safety net programs such as unemployment insurance and food stamps, are highly effective, returning well over $1 in economic activity for each dollar spent. In contrast, tax cuts for high-income taxpayers yield just 40 cents on the dollar, and corporate tax breaks return just 20 cents on the dollar.



Money invested in infrastructure, unemployment insurance, or aid to state governments is quickly re-spent in local economies, spurring a cycle of increased economic activity. Dollars saved by tax cuts, especially for wealthy individuals and corporations, are much more likely to be socked away. Because the U.S. economy is currently underperforming due to decreased demand for goods and services, tax cuts for the already privileged are far less effective than spending as economic stimulus.

SOURCE:
http://www.epi.org/economic_snapshots/entry/money_well_spent/

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:10 PM
Original message
Yes, but that does not fit the Regressive Party agenda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Saving and bookmarking this! This is ALL that has to be shown
in Congress to get rid of the tax breaks for the elite and for the corporations. imho It's the government's numbers....how can they so summarily ditch these numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why is this so hard for Repugs to understand? EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. not a matter of understanding; remember, they want Obama to fail, which means the country fails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC