With Sarah sticking her nose in the birther issue, this is an old but relevant

[mfcorey1]

article. She needs to answer some questions.

If it’s Sarah Palin, why is she distinctly not pregnant in a photograph which was apparently taken on Super Tuesday, which is in February, when, as Jazz Shaw points out, Palin would have been about six months along in her pregnancy? Keep in mind, before we wind up the Friday night activities in Blogistan, that this is still only ten hours after the announcement of Sarah Palin as John McCain’s VP announcement caught so many of us flat-footed. In ten hours, though, the hits keep on coming. Let’s take a quick look at a few more.

The first one, and possibly the most tawdry of the bunch, came via several e-mails which arrived after the announcement here at Jazz Headquarters. Check out this picture of Sarah Palin from Super Tuesday this year. It’s a nice shot, but according to at least once source it was taken on Super Tuesday. That’s in February. At that point, Palin should have been six months pregnant with her last child. It does make me wonder if the following will turn into a story. …the oldest girl is rumored to have actually been the one who had the last baby, the one with Down’s Syndrome. She was taken out of school the last 4 or 5 months of her mother’s pregnancy.

On March 5th, 2008 Alaska’s Republican Governor, Sarah Palin, announced to the media that she was 7 months pregnant with her 5th child. She is currently 44. Palin’s daughter Bristol is 16 and attends an Anchorage high school. Students who have attended class with her report that she has been out of school for months, claiming a prolonged case of mono.
Palin does not appear pregnant in any recent photographs. The announcement came as quite a shock to people who had worked closely with her, and have been quoted as saying that she did not appear pregnant whatsoever during the prior 7 months. While this is debatable, you can judge for yourself here: http://gov.state.ak.us/photos.php

(Ed Note: That link has since died since we first looked at it. The pictures were removed today.)
IF there is anything to this story, there are two issues as I see them. First, and most obvious, is the honesty issue. Why would Palin have lied about who the mother was? Which leads to the second issue: If Bristol Palin IS the mother, how does she feel about all this? If the story is true, and Sarah Palin lied to spare her daughter embarrassment or emotional pain, what does that say about how Bristol Palin felt about the pregnancy itself?

The fact that the photographs of Sarah Palin at a time when she would have appeared to be pregnant, if she really was, were taken down and the link killed, is a little odd if there’s nothing to the story.

http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2008/08/who-is-the-mother-of-trig-paxon-van-palin

[DrDan]

1. why do we need to stoop this low

[Obamanaut]

2. Merely an old, not relevant, article. nt

[secondwind]

3. The links are not up anymore.

[Loudmxr]

4. We need to ask because the whole Texas to Alaska trip makes no sense!!

[tanyev]

5. Sarah Palin's Pregnancy Decision Map

[MacNfries]

6. I think it has a lot of relevancy ... on several fronts!

First, and probably most importantly, it means her daughter was of illegal age when she conceived. Was the father someone close to Sarah, and she covered it up? Could it even be Bristol's own father? If so, now it becomes a case of incest as well as statutory rape.

Secondly, an investigation of Sarah's coverup would make her involved in a coverup of an illegal act, and certainly would take her off the political circuit ... which I think all Democrats and many Republicans would desire.

Thirdly, a female, especially the age of Bristol, is most fertile right after having a baby, which explains Bristol's pregnancy during Sarah Palin's presidential campaign.

The investigation would have to be done privately until absolute proof was established.

So, no, I don't think this inquiry is ridiculous ... no more so than the Birthers persistency! Certainly the motive and explanation of what actually happened makes more sense than a woman, in her 40's, with political drive, and a history of marital problems makes getting pregnant.

[mfcorey1]

7. ITA!

[Raschel]

8. Show us the birth certificate Palin! Why haven't you? Do you have something to hide? There must be

something on there she doesn't want anyone to see! Put it online to stop the rumors!

Just like the birther talking points about the President. Similar to 'when did you stop beating your wife'.

Palin's fair game.

[SpiralHawk]

9. + 1

What's sauce for the gander is sauce for the quitter goose.