Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barry Bonds Poll Question 1: Is what Bonds did worse than what Mike Vick did?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 04:57 PM
Original message
Poll question: Barry Bonds Poll Question 1: Is what Bonds did worse than what Mike Vick did?
In terms of the severity of the offense, how (in your mind) does Bobds' conviction stack up to the conviction of Mike Vick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. did it to himself
And B.S. on the integrity of the game! That was compromised long before Bonds went on his binge.

Vick impacted animals by his behavior.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with Rufus! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. He did it to himself, not to others, so not as bad. Lying to the Grand Jury however, that was very
wrong. I cannot compare that to animal abuse since they are very different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nope. What he does to his body, I don't care. What Vick did to dogs, unforgiveable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. While I despise what Vick did, is there any valid reason for bringing him up again
Mind you I hate the SOB an awful lot and all but I do not see any reason to discuss Vick in relation to Bonds.

Other than an excuse to trash Vick some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Lying the the grand jury is what he's up for. Not for using steroids but for lying under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. people don't seem to get that
:)

For all that money it seems like he should have been able to afford a good lawyer to get him through that grand jury without creating a legal nightmare for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Both athletes. Both federal criminals. Both convicted for a charge other than their best known crime
There are a lot of commonalities. I'm just wondering who will get the harsher sentence in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Steroid use in baseball had no place in our courts system, anyway. Don't care if he lied. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why is it so darned important for people to scrounge around
to try to find reasons for these sports guys to get away with breaking laws? I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. I just thank the Gods of justice that so much time and money was spent
prosecuting an athlete for using steroids. Bad money thrown after worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. This last bit was for lying to the grand jury, not for drug use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Lying about drug use.
That's how the whole stupid thing started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It doesn't matter, you aren't supposed to lie to a grand jury. I know how it started and
think at the most he should have just been not allowed to play again. But lying to a grand jury is him piling stupidity upon illegality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sure it was. He stole from all of us, lying mofo anyway
his home run record should be expunged
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. then who would hold the record!
Another lying MOFO!

The owners and commissioner screwed the pooch by ignoring steroid use. Of course the McGuire/Sosa drama was good for gate receipts and TV revenue. Go look back at guys who were hitting 50 home runs in those years, it was a friggen joke.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Can't you get Snooki into this poll somehow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. of course not, but it's still some bad shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. So when are the bankers gonna face the law?
I don't give a shit about Barry Bonds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-13-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. Lying to Congress? Hell, Senators do that all the time.
Barry should just say that he never meant for any of those to be factual statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC