Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Japan report: “Nuclear fuel has melted in three reactors” — Risk of “massive radioactive release”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 12:58 PM
Original message
Japan report: “Nuclear fuel has melted in three reactors” — Risk of “massive radioactive release”
http://enenews.com/japan-report-fuel-has-melted-in-three-reactors-risk-of-massive-radioactive-release

Melted fuel rod fragments have sunk to the bottoms of three reactors at the Fukushima No. 1 power plant and could theoretically burn through the pressure vessels if emergency water-pumping operations are seriously disrupted, the Atomic Energy Society of Japan said Friday.

If too many of the melted fuel fragments puddle at the bottom, they can generate enough concentrated heat to bore a hole in the pressure vessel, which would result in a massive radioactive release to the environment. …

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. also: April 16 forecast shows radioactive cloud stretching from Texas to Canada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is enenews reputable or on the sensational side?
Just asking....
Lots of "ifs" and "theoreticallys" here. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah, various sources on there
im not sure if i am qualified to say one way or the other lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They have links from EPA, AP, and so on
If some of their links are sensational, their site still appears to be one of the best in terms of updated info that is not readily available from the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. I have been following their links, find to be a bit sensationalist.
Fer instance, the radiation pic in the OP is for XE 133.
Has a half life of 5.75 days, I have no idea how much is "in" the cloud, or what constitutes the low level amount used on the graph.
It is used in medical testing/imaging, " a radionuclide that is inhaled to assess pulmonary function, and to image the lungs. It is also often used to image blood flow, particularly in the brain."
How much is good, indifferent, bad, I dunno.
How high that nice purple/blue cloud is, I have no idea.
What makes the blue/purple stuff dissipate, I have no idea.

So, overall, the picture is not really useful to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why do these seem to be on obscure sites and not CNN or the AP? n-t
Edited on Sat Apr-16-11 01:13 PM by Logical
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. AP is the source. News media are not publishing the report at this time
Or so it appears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. OK, thanks. Sorry, should have searched more. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. UPI reported it - the info is from the Atomic Energy Society of Japan
Edited on Sat Apr-16-11 01:20 PM by jpak
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2011/04/15/Melted-nuclear-fuel-becomes-granular/UPI-16351302865363/

TOKYO, April 15 (UPI) -- Nuclear fuel in the damaged reactors of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has partially melted and settled in granular form, an analysis said Friday.

The grains have collected at the bottom of the pressure vessels of the No. 1, 2 and 3 reactors in the six-reactor plant damaged by a March 11 earthquake and tsunami, but do not pose any threat of a chain reaction, Kyodo News reported, quoting the Atomic Energy Society of Japan, an academic panel on nuclear energy safety.

An analysis by the panel said the pressure vessels have been kept at relatively low temperatures, thereby preventing any large buildup of the melted fuel grains, which could become hot and cause damage that could trigger radioactive emissions.

The panel's deputy chairman was quoted as saying it could take up to three months for the reactor fuel to be stabilized.

<more>

The MSM is only interested in Happy Talk you see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. OK, thanks. Sorry, should have searched more. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. so if fragments "settle" (what a calming word lol) into a pile..
seems like that would make it hard to cool. unless if formed a nice even layer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Seems like the might regain criticality too - lots of soothing Happy Talk about this thingy
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. video sampling of water in the spent fuel pool of Unit 4 (hot, boiling water)
http://martynwilliams.posterous.com/spent-fuel-pools-at-fukushima-daiichi

The video and images 1 through 3 show the sampling of water in the spent fuel pool of Unit 4 on April 12. The pictures make more sense when you've seen the video, so I recommend you watch it first. TEPCO used a crane to lower a vessel into the pool to collect water.

Images 4 and 5 were taken on April 14 from the concrete-pumping vehicle that's being used to direct water into the spent fuel pool at unit 3 and show the pool.

Images 6 and 7 come from the T-Hawk remote controlled helicopter and show reactor building 1 on April 14.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Very interesting video! Thank you!
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Excellent link, thank you. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. What are they considering a massive radioactive release?
At least we are past the point of the NUklr experts shouting everyone else down about worrying too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. x amount of fuel burning thru the floor? not sure...
maybe the experts can speculate lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
36. HA!
Funny, the days after the tragedy they were out in full force...now not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. When they say "risk" that means "done deal" right?
There is no way to avoid that now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Safety Commission revealed that it had waited weeks to publish information on elevated radiation

Meanwhile, Japan’s Nuclear Safety Commission revealed this week that it had waited weeks to publish information on elevated radiation levels from the plant last month partly to avoid panic. “Some foreigners fled the country even when there appeared to be little risk,” said Seiji Shiroya, an official with the independent government panel. “If we immediately decided to label the situation as Level 7, we could have triggered a panicked reaction.”

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2011/0415/1224294728753.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
19.  Another example of frogs in boiling water scenerio.
Given the dire state what should the authorities have done? This is not to condone what the authorities have done but a sincere question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Maybe they could have given out honest info so people could decide for themselves??
Just as here on DU,
there are people who can see a likely possibility, and choose to act "just in case"
there are people who don't see a likely possibility, and who continue to search for information,
there are people who try to ignore the possibilities of a problem,
and there are people who insist there is no possibility of any danger whatsoever,
and who insist on shouting down anyone who ever speculates there could be danger.

It is one thing for a government to withhold info. out of fear of causing panic
and quite another for a government intentionally lie, to intentionally cover up reality,
to enable others to make a profit or to hide wrong doing.
We have had way too much of the latter.
The consequences are a lot of people do not trust "authorities" anymore, and are being much more pro-active.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Let's say from the get go Japan announced a Level 7 nuclear catastrophe what
what could an entire population do with that information? What specific actions could any citizen have taken? The problem as I see it is that govts and the nuke industry worldwide have no idea what to do with this sort of disaster. They can assess the severity of the crisis and announce it but without any plan or solution what does the public do other than futilely surfing the net for solutions and protections that don't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Yep.
Might be a good time to fill out all those credit card applications that have been piling up in the mailbox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. I don't understand that comment. I'm not condoning keeping info away from the public
but if authorities have absolutely no plan to deal with a monumental nuclear disaster but have to do something, I can understand a decsion to forestall panic. Again I'm condoning it but I can understand why authorities would fall back on that. Now that the threat level has increased what new public safety protocols have been implemented?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Lemme try again.
My comment that you did not understand was basically, there is nothing we really can do at this juncture, nowhere to run, nowhere to hide, etc. Might as well make the most of it.

However..I do not think the issue is to "forestall panic". TPTB clearly do not give a damn about the populace.
They DO give a damn about being caught fucking up big time and losing out on money.
BP was totally blatant that it was all about money and avoiding culpability, TEPCO was caught several times fudging
safety and inspection reports.

The rich folks are not going to be hurt in any way if there is a panic.
They ARE going to be hurt if their stock dips, and do and will lie like hell to keep that stock up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
franzia99 Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. For starters, the evacuation zone wasn't large enough per their own numbers.
People living close to the plant could have gotten the heck away. Also, as the news source said, a lot of foreigners left the country. I bet you more would have gotten out of Dodge if Japan had been honest up front.

Japanese citizens could also make choices about what food and water they think is safe. Also, when it comes down to it, there are Japanese citizens who would be willing to leave the country to wait this thing out.

The point is, they have a right to decide for themselves what they want to do in the face of this danger. Your comment is pretty unreasonable to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. As I stated I was asking a question not making a comment. Not a rhetorical
question, a real question becasue it seems to me that the only substantive thing the govt could do is avoid panic because they clearly have no plan to deal with this. I am not condoning this. Since announcing this higher threat lever level is there a new protocol in place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
franzia99 Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. People have a right to know the risks. They should've been honest.
The authorities should have been up front regarding the risks and about what they knew and didn't yet know. I don't need someone deciding whether something is too "scary" for me to hear. I also don't trust them to give proper regard to the interests of us little, or "small people" as former BP CEO Tony Hayward has called us.

Furthermore, because there's this history of authorities lying to us about risk, nobody trusts them when they say everything is fine. So to some extent their lying is counterproductive to their cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. They used the stick-the-toe-water method. Oops, earthquake but all's fine.
Little radiation, but all's fine. Coupla burned workers, but all's fine. Cracks but all's fine. Hafta pump water into ocean, but all's fine. Cessium in ocean but all's fine.

Look's like FUBAR. Everyone jump in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Waiting for DU's nuclear "experts" to pooh-pooh this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. The thing is that there isn't a drop of news in it. We knew all that already.
So the function of it is what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. To remind people to be scared?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. And remember. It will never harm us over here. Uh uh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. i guess the media has chosen to ignore these little annoyances
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
35. Packbot working inside the reactor building of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 10:54 AM by meow mix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC