Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Highest-paid UC execs demand millions in benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 11:41 PM
Original message
Highest-paid UC execs demand millions in benefits
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/29/MNDC1GUSCT.DTL

Three dozen of the University of California's highest-paid executives are threatening to sue unless UC agrees to spend tens of millions of dollars to dramatically increase retirement benefits for employees earning more than $245,000.

"We believe it is the University's legal, moral and ethical obligation" to increase the benefits, the executives wrote the Board of Regents in a Dec. 9 letter and position paper obtained by The Chronicle.

"Failure to do so will likely result in a costly and unsuccessful legal confrontation," they wrote, using capital letters to emphasize that they were writing "URGENTLY."

Their demand comes as UC is trying to eliminate a vast, $21.6 billion unfunded pension obligation by reducing benefits for future employees, raising the retirement age, requiring employees to pay more into UC's pension fund and boosting tuition.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/28/MNDC1GUSCT.DTL#ixzz19ZBbO3KW

More of that "shared sacrifice" thing, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. University executives get paid really well.... Is this warranted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What, I wonder, are the benefits of the less well paid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. 1,400 a month for this retired UC worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. argh!! this makes my blood boil
Edited on Thu Dec-30-10 01:01 AM by dana_b
my deartment is being dissolved. Before that I hadn't had a raise in years and they want all the rest of the employees to pay more for their pensions but Laret (the CEO of UCSF,-where I work for another 3 weeks) who makes well over half a million a year (plus 30% bonuses) and the other execs think that they deserve increased retirement beneits?! Fuck them.

edit - I sent the article to my fellow workers and nurses. I hope they get as irate as I am. When California is suffering and publi pensions are already under attack, this b.s. doesn't help and these execs know it.

"Under UC's formula, which calculates retirement benefits on only the first $245,000 of pay, an employee earning $400,000 a year who retires after 30 years would get a $183,750 annual pension.

Lift the cap, and the pension rises to $300,000." holy shit!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why all this greed at the top ? What world do they live in ?
These very same people asked for reduction of benefits from employees. We fought for two years for a 1 1/2% pay raise, yes that's right, one and a half percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC