Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We all know the real reason Brewer vetoed the wang-wang bill:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:57 PM
Original message
We all know the real reason Brewer vetoed the wang-wang bill:
At some point, you would have to verify if the record was accurate. This would mean that one would have to inspect said wang-wang of said male candidate...and Donald Trump wouldn't stop offering to be the first to have it inspected.

We all know his new slogan would have been:
Vote for me, and I'll show you my wang-wang.

And lord knows we would have to see if the carpets match the drapes. Somewhere down south on the Donald there is a swoop of...hair...there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who gets to verify the wang wang?? is that a union position?? What pay grade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not a very hard job.
Or at least you would hope it wouldn't be.

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not so...very difficult and exhaustive work..much photos and matching of wang wang
prints to originals...them prints gatta match and be verified by the Wang Inspecteor 2 and signed off by the Head Wang Superintendent.

I guess they didn't have funds for the Wang Verification Dept
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. ewwwwwww
now I have to rinse my brain of those images.... :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. and that's essentially what she said in the statement she issued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. you'd need a magnifying device to see the Donald's, his ego shrunk it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC