originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-18-11 07:57 PM
Original message |
We all know the real reason Brewer vetoed the wang-wang bill: |
|
At some point, you would have to verify if the record was accurate. This would mean that one would have to inspect said wang-wang of said male candidate...and Donald Trump wouldn't stop offering to be the first to have it inspected.
We all know his new slogan would have been: Vote for me, and I'll show you my wang-wang.
And lord knows we would have to see if the carpets match the drapes. Somewhere down south on the Donald there is a swoop of...hair...there.
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-18-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Who gets to verify the wang wang?? is that a union position?? What pay grade? |
originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-18-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's not a very hard job. |
|
Or at least you would hope it wouldn't be.
:P
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-18-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Not so...very difficult and exhaustive work..much photos and matching of wang wang |
|
prints to originals...them prints gatta match and be verified by the Wang Inspecteor 2 and signed off by the Head Wang Superintendent.
I guess they didn't have funds for the Wang Verification Dept
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-18-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
now I have to rinse my brain of those images.... :puke:
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-18-11 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
5. and that's essentially what she said in the statement she issued. |
Historic NY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-18-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
6. you'd need a magnifying device to see the Donald's, his ego shrunk it. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |