Should Palin baby threads be moved to the 9/11 Forum?

[Renew Deal]

:tinfoilhat:

[CaliforniaPeggy]

1. Other: This is a question for ATA. nt

[Renew Deal]

3. I am interested in what DUers think.

So far I know what the admins have done.

[PDJane]

2. move her to her own dungeon......

Give her her own site and let everything about the woman go there.

[ZombieHorde]

4. I don't know, what are the best pieces of evidence "both sides" are using? nt

[AlabamaLibrul]

5. No, it has nothing to do with 9/11 that shouldn't be the catch all nt

[Electric Monk]

6. I think the 9/11 forum should be renamed, or another forum created

for "unproven theories" or something similar.

[ohheckyeah]

7. I just really don't care

one way or the other. If I don't want to read a thread I don't click on it.

[Urban Prairie]

8. Palin used those infants to further her and the Rethug's "pro-life" agenda

Rightwingers are NOT truly "pro-life", they are merely pro-embryo. They are not adamant about human life after it vacates the womb, IF that life in fact must or needs to be subsidized supported by any means with their tax dollars after birth.

Palin needs to be exposed for the fraud she is IF so, and claiming Trig as an exemption on their federal taxes would be a felony, if in fact the infant/baby really IS not hers.

[Tresalisa]

9. I don't care.

I'm SICK of hearing about Sarah Palin. She owns a spot in too many people's heads and she's a nothingburger(ette?), IMO.

So, that said, I really don't think threads on the subject should stop on DU, there could be something to this. If it's something I'm not interested in, or that make me wanna :puke: I move on to another thread.

[Warren DeMontague]

10. She's made her reproductive system part of her agenda to legislate everyone else's

so, no.

[Capitalocracy]

14. That's an excellent point. nt

[TheKentuckian]

11. Other: Dungeons are lame and I don't give a shit if it is true or not.

[yurbud]

12. OTHER: It is probably true but not important.

The only thing that made me think otherwise, however briefly, was the airtime given to the birther nonsense about Obama, but this story is considered beyond the pale though it has more evidence to back it up.

[yurbud]

13. the way your first three options are worded makes anyone who might think it's true look like a loon

[upi402]

15. 9-11 needs to be looked at

I never used to think so, but there's too much BS and cover-up... too much smoke to be no fire.

[Renew Deal]

18. The 9/11 forum here is the conspiracy forum.

Most junk theories end up there.

[upi402]

22. Looks like 9-11 isn't a junk conspiracy theory

I finally looked at interviews and facts, instead of the BS on the TV News and from pundits - who all label it junk theory. If you haven't seen the conference that Free Speech TV aired with architects, engineers, and fireman interviews - you should.

And yes, I know the 9-11 forum is considered that here. I haven't checked it out as I felt it was bogus before. Not now, I'll check it out.

[Rex]

16. No, the 9/11 forum has some really interesting information in it.

Whereas anything involving Sarah Palin should be considered a lathery/foaming/frothing type substance that has no practical value.

[Obamanaut]

17. No, they should be automatically deleted two seconds after the 'post' button is pressed. nt

[UTUSN]

19. "No, I hate Quitter & don't care if it's true or not" sums up my tack for ALL wingnuts n/t

[Renew Deal]

20. Isn't that dishonest?

[Electric Monk]

23. "Just hate and don't care about truth" sums up wingnuts, as well.

Something you may want to think about.

[L. Coyote]

21. No, but the ones about Palin being Trump's love child should be.

Just cuz they have the same hair doesn't .... :rofl:

[tritsofme]

24. Birthers, truthers, these guys, birds of a feather. nt

[HolyCity2012]

25. No, I hate Palin and I don't care if it's true or not

<-(O_o)->