Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GAB denies Kloppenburg’s request for private investigator to investigate Nickolaus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:08 AM
Original message
GAB denies Kloppenburg’s request for private investigator to investigate Nickolaus
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 06:50 AM by eowyn_of_rohan
Election board refutes challenger’s claims of partiality in vote counts

The Badger Herald
Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:21 p.m.
http://badgerherald.com/news/2011/04/21/gab_denies_kloppenbu.php
Kloppenburg first announced she would request a recount Wednesday. That same day she also said she would be asking the GAB to appoint an independent investigator to take another look into the Waukesha County clerk, who discovered 14,000 votes from her county went uncounted.

“The Government Accountability Board should hire an independent investigator to conduct an investigation because the Government Accountability Board worked closely with clerks on a day to day basis, and that relationship, though appropriate, compromises the board’s ability to conduct an investigation,” Mulliken said.

In a letter sent to the GAB Wednesday concerning the request for an independent investigator, Kloppenburg’s attorney Susan Crawford said there was correspondence between GAB investigators and Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus that amounted to an “alliance.”

The GAB released a statement from director Kevin Kennedy addressing Kloppenburg’s criticisms of their process and refusing to step aside in the investigation. “With respect to the public statements about our impartiality, it is the statutory responsibility of this agency to conduct these operations,” Kennedy said in the statement. “We are authorized to employ outside investigators, but they work under our direction.”

(sorry -posted too many paragraphs) :blush:

Also this article talks about the GAB suit filed in regard to erasing/destroying voting data from the cartridges. This suit offered the judge an option to allow for hand recounts rather than having data erased. The judge ruled that the ballots should be hand counted - What a RELIEF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. How much do memory sticks cost?
Can't they just give them fresh ones instead of rewriting over the old ones (and potentially destroying evidence)?
Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Do these machines have programmable memory?
The electronic recount should be done with machines that have passed new certification trials.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yes, we need new voting equipment
They can be programmed alright, and here the GAB is saying these cartridges are no longer being manufactured, and there are not enough available ANYWHERE, apparently, to have enough new ones for a recount (hence they want to re-use the ones that were used on voting day). Does this sound like an intentional shortage (not necessarily on the part of our own GAB), so that this deletion of election data could occur?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. GAB says the memory cartridges no longer are manufactured - not enough available
:eyes:
Time for a whole new system, because this is ridiculous

Here is the text regarding this issue from GAB's Authenticated Summons and Complaint, filed yesterday -

13. GAB has been advised that the memory cartridges no longer are manufactured, insufficient memory cartridges are available from the manufacturer or other sources (for instance, one manufacturer has only 246 reserve memory cartridges, but 3 jurisdictions alone need memory cartridges exceeding this amount. - The City of Milwaukee requires 160, Dane County requires 136, and Brown County requires 88), and the counties that will use the Optech Eagle for the recount have insufficient reserve memory cartridges in addition to the ones which were used in the APril 2011 spring election, which contain the record of the votes cast, and which cannot be cleared or erased under Wis Stat. 7.23(2). As a result GAB believes that the counties cannot comply with the requirement of Wis Stat 7.32(2) and 9.01(1)(b) without violating the requirement of Wis Stat. 7.32(2) and vice versa.

http://gab.wi.gov/sites/default/files/publication/65/authenticated_summons_and_complaint_pdf_79430.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. They should try eBay
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. :) There are more than 19 on ebay now
probably not the right kind but they have at least one thing in common!

Dallas Semiconductor
DS1217
32K X 8 Nonvolatile Read/Write Cartridge
Rare and hard to find !

Nice Collection & Conversation Piece of Vintage Computer History.

I was told these were used only once to store data from a pre-production voting machine to store data like voting information.
Project was later canceled due to technology upgrades & security.
I guess it would be real easy to re-program (votes) on these little cartridges. :rofl: (Ya Think?)

http://cgi.ebay.com/Dallas-Semiconductor-DS1217-RW-Cartridge-32KX8-Rare-IC-/380162933560?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item58837a0338

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gadjitfreek Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. When is Jimmy Carter
going to start overseeing elections in THIS country to make sure they are fair and aboveboard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. They cannot due to the fact of Carter's affiliation with Democratic Party.
www.CarterCenter.org

As part of its mission, The Carter Center works to promote effective and accountable democratic institutions and processes around the world. The focus of this mission is abroad, where the Center is recognized as a nonpartisan and impartial actor in its work to monitor elections and reinforce democracy. In the United States, however, President Carter's affiliation with the Democratic Party could be perceived as detracting from our ability to be impartial.

For additional information on these and related issues, see the attached “Q & A sheet” on U.S. elections, which also can be found on the Center’s webpage (www.CarterCenter.org - click on Peace Programs, then click on Democracy Program, and on the right side of the screen is a box titled “Read About U.S. Elections.”)


Carter is the only one I would trust with it; and he cannot do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. He's been asked about this.
The US doesn't qualify for oversight. This country does not meet the minimum standards of fairness and uniformity required by the Declaration of Principles of International Election Observation and Code of Conduct adopted at the United Nations in 2005.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6439233 (skip toward the end of the interview)
http://www.cartercenter.org/peace/democracy/index.html

We don't qualify. The U.S. is not democratic (small d) enough. That's a cold splash of water down the back, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. the fix is in
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 07:46 AM by Botany
An outside investigation needs to be done on the process. End of story.

Nickolaus lied in her press conference about how she found the votes and what was the problem
that caused those 14,000 votes to go missing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. +1,000 !
"An outside investigation needs to be done on the process. End of story."


:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. How do you overrule the GAB? State or US Supreme Court?
I think we have many twists and turns to look forward to in this recount...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. doesn't sound like accountability is a big part of the ....
.... GAB

FYI

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8486

Old Kathy has a long string of "problems."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Neither party wants the election system exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who are the members of GAB? They seem to be incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC