Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intrade--remember them?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:50 PM
Original message
Intrade--remember them?
If not, you probably should look em up. They were better (and faster) than any poll in 2008, a real-time market indicator of (monetary-based) confidence in the probability of real-word outcomes. As has often been stated, people are far less likely to let their biases get in the way when they have a chance of losing money. (The morning of the election, the Obama market was flying high at 85%.)

Obama's re-election has been hovering around 58% or so recently--a number considerably higher than his poll numbers would have you think. President-elect Romney is the second highest at--get this--12%. And President The Donald? A lean 5.5%, behind Palenty.

But I don't really care about any of these margins per se, and neither should you--Obama's way out in front because he doesn't have a front-running opponent yet, and I'm sure things will change after the GOP primary is over. I just wanted to see what has been happening since this morning's events.

Actually, nothing too dramatic. But for what it's worth Obama's gone up to 59.5% (although perhaps that's also because Bernake's speech about the economy continuing to improve gave confidence to the market watchers.) And Trump has gone down to 5.2%. Nothing huge--but it proves my contention that Donald Trump has not a shot in hell of winning the nomination.

It also suggests that Obama's bold move today only helped him and hurt Trump, if it did anything at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the reminder. Needless to say, it's going to be interesting to watch.
I still don't think Donald believes any of the shit he's spouting. "The Donald" is a showman, and this is about raising his profile, and yanking NBC's chain in contract negotiations. I hope they dump his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Honestly, I think 58% is excessively low.
I don't see the GOP having ANYONE who can seriously challenge Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomb Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. not sure, but I think 58% of the pop. vote is a huge landslide for a prez election....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, it's not saying he'll get 58% of the popular vote.
The 58 means that you can bet $58 today and if Obama wins reelection you will get paid $100. (In any other scenario you will lose the $58). In other words, there is a 58% probability that Obama will win reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent barometer of theoretical odds at a point in time
Political wagering was far more juicy prior to Intrade, bargains galore. Sites put up fixed odds that were often way off, more in tune with media overreaction. It was the equivalent of betting against a house oddsmaker instead of wisdom of the crowds.

In short, I'm glad I got in early. My mathematical systems in the late mid '90s through early '00s weren't nearly as sophisticated as others use today, but they didn't need to be. I may have been 3% off but the line was 20% off.

Anyway, an incumbent with 50ish approval is going to be a favorite at this point. And even if his approval were 20% or 80% the odds wouldn't be extremely tilted. It might be 30/70 or 70/30 but probably closer to 35s and 65s. This far removed there has to be significant play in the number, with so many variables in play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC