Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This DoD-CIA leadership swap makes me really nervous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:05 PM
Original message
This DoD-CIA leadership swap makes me really nervous
Are these two the only possible choices? Were any other choices considered?

What about a guy like Wes Clark?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Petraus being groomed for Emperor
he will probably run on the repuke ticket -
now all the coziness of DOD and CIA , whoopie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Petraus would be acceptable to many Democratic politicians and their funders.

Hell, he's acceptable to Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wes Clark is probably not dirty enough to run CIA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why worry about corruption? Just put the criminals directly in charge!
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. What crimes are Leon Panetta guilty of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He gives great cover for criminals involved in torture
He advises that everyone consider "the reality" of 9/11 and "looking forward, not back" and away from investigations.

please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Is CIA or DIA running drones in Pakistan?
I really don't know. Also, there was Jeremy Scahill's story about our bombing in Yemen. Same question. Since Obama took office, CIA has been more active in Latin America, specifically in Honduras and Ecuador. It will likely be a while before the specifics get out.

Panetta has also continued to hide the CIA torture program. The black site at Bagram is still open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Crimes? How many cover ups has he been involved in?
Presumably CIA, as well --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. just proves what I've known all along. The DoD is the enforcement arm of the CIA
Gone are the days of tiny Central American coups funded, staffed, and supported by little CIA OPS. Now we'll send in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Well, it's more like a cycling back to sending in the Marines. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think Gen. Petraeus
Has proven himself and is a better participant for this position, besides I think the intelligence community has too many Rogue
Agents roaming about the place that needs reeling in, that is my opinion anyway and the agency needs some type of military
discipline.



That is my 2 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. "Up" is "Down," eh? This is more militarization of the CIA --
CIA should be a civilian position -- not military --

One question we might ask is ...

"How many CIA presidents have we had so far?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmmettKelly Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Just doing the job that Rummy wanted done, consolidate
the intelligence apparatus in the Pentagon. Streamline it and bury it out of (over)sight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's ridiculous .... but look at the rest of the Obama team -- !!! Same fingerprints ... !!!
One question we might ask is ..

How many CIA presidents have we had so far?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Keep Petraeus out of the Presidential race, simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. There are likely at least a couple of HWBush-friendly CIA persons who are unhappy about this.
I've been waiting to see how Obama approaches the topic of the CIA, and now it begins to show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Not sure to what you're alluding.
GHWB connections vis a vis Obama? I'm not following.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. HWBush was director of the CIA and helped Reagan do the Iran deal
then later the Iran/Contra stuff, etc. etc. etc.

I believe that the Bush family still have faithful people in the CIA, and through them, their fingers on any number of things. That, and through their ties with the extremely rich world-wide. Some sort of New World Order...

Let's see...Neil Bush helped destroy Silverado Savings and Loan and the taxpayers covered it. George Bush created any number of failed businesses and profited from them. George Bush tried for six months to get us to allow Wall Street to control the Social Security money (thankfully, we said NO to that). Bush later gives Wall Street and banks tons of money and we nearly get the second Great Depression. Obama headed that one off.

All I see of the Bush family and their close money buddies is profit from destruction and political power grabs through nefarious means. Disaster Capitalism turned upon the USA itself. I've digressed too far to present examples of the -results- of Bush family actions but all of this together stinks to high heaven, and there has to be a common thread somewhere. I'm hoping that if there are a couple of persons in the CIA still loyal to Bush at those levels, that they are soon rooted out and exposed for everyone to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. All of that is common knowledge
Much of that is seen by many to be pure tin foil hat stuff.

All of that being what it is, what does any of it have to do with Obama's DoD/CIA leadership shift?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. It is all true, that the Bush family has been profiting from tragedy, as has Cheney, etc.
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 01:33 PM by Fire Walk With Me
Bush Sr. involved directly as head of the CIA with major, perhaps treasonous processes for political gain...with the recognition of the process of Disaster Capitalism and the oil grab in Iraq (and the funneling of major taxpayer funds into the hands of Bush and Cheney favorite companies and friend's companies) and with Enron a significant Bush campaign advisor and contributor...it is no difficult leap to seeing that this is all on purpose and by design. Even daddy Bush declared a New World Order, likely one of the very rich gaining more power and riches. And that is exactly what has been going on.

That daddy Bush might still have significant support from old friends in the CIA isn't a long shot. We'll have to see. And to your question, Obama might be able to find out through these new director assignments.

Edit: Have you seen "Fahrenheit 9/11" and "Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room"? Required viewing, even if you go no further in regard to considering conspiracies, etc. It is by far bad enough as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Meh, they are both failures as institutions and should be replaced.
That line of thinking will earn you a bullet and a quick burial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. It's all politics..
Panetta has a knack for making cuts and Petraeus will not be a political threat as VP or President on the Republican ticket if he is busy at CIA...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC