Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you people hate the Royals so much why are you starting so many threads to tell us

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:15 PM
Original message
If you people hate the Royals so much why are you starting so many threads to tell us
I mean I really hate Onions but I've yet to start a "I Hate Onions" thread.

I think I've started exactly one "I Hate American Idol" thread in my lifetime. Now I just ignore them.

Before you judge the royals and expecially Prince William - why don't you read about his charitable works. The Prince knows anything with his name attached to it can raise alot of money, which is why he is involved with so many great charties including AIDs, World Hunger, the Environment, Homelessness and a host of others notable causes. And when he's not raising money for charities he's serving his country although I will say it's a bit limited. I know he'd serve overseas in Iraq or Afghanistan but his brother lasted about 2-3 months until it became a security risk for the others who served with him.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Typical D.U.
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 12:18 PM by samplegirl
Some people just have to have something to complain about!
Guess thats why we have the unrec....feature here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Haters got to hate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am seriously thinking of taking some time off from DU on account of random negativity.
The world has enough of actual bad news without having to be subjected to the venom that has been here as of late.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. don't do that
If we don't have something to bitch about we'd be dead

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarburstClock Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's propaganda for gullibles whom idolize aristocracy
There's a bigger issue that the wedding drives home and that issue is "they're royal, you're a peon".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have not started a single thread but I have invaded some of the fawning ones out of disgust
All the charity in the world does not remove the fact that these people live on the backs of working men and women.

I don't want americans in iraq or afghanistan so wtf should I applaud some so-fucking-called prince who dabbles in war?


But please to notice. I did not start this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
And I'll K&R again as needed to keep this at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. It is the concept of people being born royal by birth that is the issue.
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 12:27 PM by RandomThoughts
It hurts many people said to be that, by getting them to think in terms of superiority. And those that don't think that way still have to deal with all the people saying they are somehow different by blood lines.

Why did they invite 'other common families like the Suadies, and various members of clubs to the wedding' Why invite the Saudi Common Family? Because they support the concept of royalty.



I often wonder if the 'offer of kingdoms' told in a story in the desert is actually the attempt to get someone to claim superiority without being able to justify it by action.

What a sad life it would be to know you did nothing to obtain what you might have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Will & Kate have asked that people donate to charities
instead of giving them wedding gifts. Which I think is extremely nice. One of the charities is reportedly anti-bullying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. unRec for "you people"
From your description, this William sounds like quite a great guy.

Why wasn't he profiled here before this?

Why did it take a wedding to bring our attention to him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Possibly because threads that were started about his, and Harry's
work in Africa have dropped like rocks...? :shrug: But I'm just guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Indeed they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Idle minds beget ugly thoughts.
An old proverb...about 30 seconds old, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
42. Idiots think in comforting platitudes.
An old riddle of sorts, since it's got a reflexive or self-exposing element. Try it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. you might start more onion threads
if you couldn't turn on the TV without hearing somebody gushing about onions every twenty minutes or so.

My question is, since we already have shows like "Entertainment tonight" and "Inside Edition" why does the local and nationa news have to do segments on Charlie Sheen and Paris Hilton and Dancing with the Stars.

For that last one, I think Survivor was the show that started that. People said they were amazed at how popular the show was, but I noticed that it was far more widely marketed than other shows. The marketing people noticed as well, so I think the networks have made a point of using the news to market their other shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. i HATE BROCCOLI
And brussels sprouts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
38. Doesn't count as a reply.
You must start an OP declaiming your hatred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's the "anti-Bambi rule"
Remember how Bambi's mother told him that "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all"?

That rule has been inverted in our present day, and especially frequently here on DU: "Only say something when you have something negative to say."

In fact, it might go: "Only look for the negative and say negative things. Nothing else is interesting or eye-catching."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I hate that rule and all who follow it
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jp11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'd ask the people making the threads, not start another one to have the same discussions again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. You hate onions? Maybe you just don't understand the benefit onions offer us
or the central role they play in our culture.

We fought a war to guarantee our right to freely choose produce no matter how noxious! Probably, I slept through a lot of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. I hate stupid threads
But, seeing as I've started plenty in my near-decade on DU, I'll give any DUer plenty of leeway to start any stupid thread they want. Doesn't mean I have to respond.

DOH! I responded!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. How much "work" is that? Especially for someone who needn't work a day in his life?
All of the people who work day jobs for low wages and still volunteer for something stand in front of Prince William in the respect line don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youth Uprising Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'd wager that most people posting here hate right-wingers or at least
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 12:54 PM by Youth Uprising
harbor negative feelings towards them. Well then, since you people hate right-wingers so much, then stop posting so much about them! Otherwise, it means that you secretly love them, right?
Logic fail... People talk about things they dislike all the time. It's part of human nature. If people want to post about how much they dislike the royals, let them. Why do you care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
43. Correct. And what's more right-wing than a fookin' monarchy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. They're cranky people. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why are they royalty?
Why are they special? Why do they deserve to be millionaires for doing nothing? The idea that someone can be royalty is insane and undemocratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Bullshit
Firstly, our democracy predates yours. Secondly, you could say the same about the Bushes, Kennedys, John Kerry and everyone else who married or was born into a wealthy family. The Royals are harmless figureheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. What?
Are you really saying that the elite rich families in this country are the exact same thing as a state recognized "royal" family?

Why should you pay for their lavish lifestyle? Why does the fact that they were born into a certain family mean that they are special? Why should anyone give a shit what the queen has to say about anything? They are a family of millionaires without jobs. Why do they get to live in a palace with hundreds of guards who are paid for with your money?

The idea of a royal family is absurd and there is no reason for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. The Elite rich in our country would like to think that - did you see Trumps 3 weddings
Treated them all like he was some sort of fricking royalty. At lest with the British Royals, London and England are guaranteed to make a lot of money not just off the wedding preparations but the tourism. Here in American, no one gives a shit how many wives Trump is on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Yes, I am saying that
Since the Royals have zero power these days, that's exactly what I'm saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. You are wilfully ignorant on all matters concerning the Royal Family.
The Queen is 85 and still works. All the members of the Royal Family work. Find out where the Queens money comes from then find out how she 'rules'.

Both Prince William and Prince Harry are highly accomplished men. I would venture to say they are probably better people than anyone who has ever been voted into office (or stole an election)in the US.

Watch this;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cWz9MrHskk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why is everyone so down on the Royals?
They haven't won diddly squat in YEARS. You'd think seeing the Kansas City ballclub's bus pull up to the stadium would be an occasion for joy - all right guys, time to raise those batting averages!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. we still got Freedom of Speech, Redcoat!
No Taxation without Representation!!11!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm sick of it too
I'm actually British and I can understand Americans just not caring, he's not going to be your head of state. I can understand being pissed at the American media for giving the wedding blanket coverage but I'm also getting deeply annoyed at Americans who feel the urge to piss on our parade.

Just looking on this thread, we've got claims that having Royalty is inherently undemocratic (which is bollocks, our democracy predates yours); fury that the Royal Family are rich without having earned it (like that doesn't also apply to the Bushes, Kennedys, John Kerry and hundreds of others; at least the Royals pay taxes) and general nastiness at the marriage of a powerless figurehead that will not affect Americans in any way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. Reminiscent of the MJ threads nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
30. It's a happy occasion, dammit
Edited on Fri Apr-29-11 01:11 PM by WolverineDG
and some people here just can't be happy. For anyone. At anytime.

Not me, though. I'm all :hangover: , clinging to cups of coffee for dear life until I can close the office & head for home for a nap because I only got 3 hours' sleep last night.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. Let the complaints roll off your shoulders. I haven't allowed them to put a damper
on my interest. I stayed up to watch the wedding live & really enjoyed it.

I love William & Harry as an extension of how I felt about Diana. She was a class act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I slept most of the day but I let BBC America just keep rolling
You know what's funny. I'm not particularly romantic nor am I big on weddings. If I got married I would think eloping would be romantic.

But I like this stuff - go figure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Same here! I like Cinderella stories, but when I got married all I wanted was to go to
the Justice of the Peace. I'm not the girly-girl type. I was a tomboy as a kid & loved participating in sports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
39. Smug fans of large market teams like the Yankees and Red Sox
are secret jealous of our well loaded farm system. That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. Best answer...
Says this non-smug fan of a large market team that... keeps... LOSING, damn it!!!

* New York and not the Yankees *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
40. Because your little ceremonial for racist birth-privileges of the bloodlines...
intruded on the public space of the world's republics a bit overmuch.

Because it wasn't on the Celebrity Nonentity Channel, which you are free to watch. It was everywhere, sometimes as the only story, including the public radio "news" paid for by the taxes of people who are NOT the "subjects" of the bloodline "nobles."

Because your royal institution has a history of genocide and imperialism, and some people prefer to be alive and aware of it, rather than living in some permanent present of bullshit prince and princess stories.

How many threads were started celebrating the royal bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
44. I haven't started a thread but since you asked, as an egalitarian communist, I don't believe...
anyone on this planet deserves to be royalty or higher on some kind of social ladder than another.

This wedding btw, cost the uk taxpayers $20 million POUNDS. Why didn't they have a fund raiser to raise money for this wedding like they do for charities?

It costs more in tax payer money for william to be a royal rock star and raise money than he actually raises, I'll betchya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
45. It's an interesting issue
royalty is an anachronism today.

And one would think they least they could do is help charity. Interestingly, unknown rich people don't have the same exposure, and so don't "have" to whereas the royals are completely exposed and there would be comment if they didn't.

Unlike other rich people, one can feel for the royals, they are born into the publicity, which may not be balanced out with the riches. As for marrying one, it would be easier to marry a rich but unknown, or even somewhat known, American. Marrying a prince of the English royal family, you just can't marry him for him, you have to take that exposure. Didn't work out for Diana or Fergie too well. Hopefully this case will be different. The girl has to accept being Queen of England one day, and while it is total security for her and her children, it comes with a high price as to privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
47. The British monarchy is an ancient institution. Bitching about it on an
internet forum isn't going to make it go away.

As long as the monarchy is supported by the British public and members of the royal family continue to work on behalf of charities, I have no problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
48. I don't get it. I've NEVER gone on a thread to post that I don't care. I just skip them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC