What's not in Bannon's apology

[marylandblue]

He didn't dispute a single statement in the book. Just saying.

[Phoenix61]

1. Yep

Reminded me of Tilllerson's statement after the "f&&:$g moron" comment came out.

[sunonmars]

2. He can't because if Wolff has tapes then he can instantly be branded a liar.

[Hoyt]

5. He SAYS he has tapes, Tom Arnold said he had tapes, etc. Just saying. At some point, they are going

to have to produce them or lose credibility. Of course, even then, most Trump supporters aren't going to care.

[sunonmars]

6. unless of course, he does and they are very scared of whats on them...

its the ultimate scare, Trump does not want to pull that string......

Mueller may even request them, or even have them?

[Kirk Lover]

3. And he won't because everybody knows that it's true. So now we can really pick out the

ones....like Mike Pompeo..today shilling for tRUMP. HE is an enemy of the American people.

[sfwriter]

4. Bannon is positioning himself for Trump's downfall.

I think Fire and Fury makes Bannon's opportunism pretty clear. While Bannon's view dominates the book, it is not favorable for him. I get the impression of someone who would sell his dead grandmothers skin for lampshades if he thought it could buy him philosophical and political relevance.