General Discussion

Stinky The Clown

(67,832 posts) Fri Feb 16, 2018, 02:35 PM Feb 2018

How is this not an actual no shit honest to god act of war?

Per the mueller indictment today it was an electronic and literal invasion of the United States.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How is this not an actual no shit honest to god act of war? (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Feb 2018 OP

I'm wondering that myself. BannonsLiver Feb 2018 #1

and how is it that the bought-and-paid-for Congress will do NOTHING? spooky3 Feb 2018 #2

Victory without firing a shot. dalton99a Feb 2018 #3

Kick! NeoGreen Feb 2018 #4

Which makes Trump an honest to god TRAITOR WhiteTara Feb 2018 #5

I know, funny isn't it? If pro-russian pamplets were dropped from the skys over the USA by ... SWBTATTReg Feb 2018 #6

BannonsLiver

(16,508 posts)

1. I'm wondering that myself.

Reply to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Fri Feb 16, 2018, 02:35 PM

Feb 2018

Sometimes I think Patton had the right idea.

spooky3

(34,498 posts)

2. and how is it that the bought-and-paid-for Congress will do NOTHING?

Reply to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Fri Feb 16, 2018, 02:36 PM

Feb 2018

Nothing other than try to discredit or minimize this.

dalton99a

(81,637 posts)

3. Victory without firing a shot.

Reply to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Fri Feb 16, 2018, 02:37 PM

Feb 2018

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)

4. Kick!

Reply to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Fri Feb 16, 2018, 02:38 PM

Feb 2018

WhiteTara

(29,728 posts)

5. Which makes Trump an honest to god TRAITOR

Reply to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Fri Feb 16, 2018, 02:39 PM

Feb 2018

Collaborators were shot on the spot in WWII.

SWBTATTReg

(22,176 posts)

6. I know, funny isn't it? If pro-russian pamplets were dropped from the skys over the USA by ...

Reply to Stinky The Clown (Original post)

Fri Feb 16, 2018, 02:40 PM

Feb 2018

a Russian jet, wouldn't this constitute an act of war? What's different about electronically attacking us vs. any other means? None.

Reply to this discussion