Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sensible thinkers - by Tom Tomorrow (Original Post) kpete Jan 2012 OP
That's just about what happen. I wonder if we put a draft in and require all men including southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #1
All men? Try all citizens. Bluenorthwest Jan 2012 #4
That will never happen. Ever until the ERA has finally passed some of the states. So far I think southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #8
It should be insisted on, it makes selling any war that much harder. TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #9
Listen I have worked with the military. I know how SOME women play the system. To be perfectly southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #17
I agree with you. SheilaT Jan 2012 #20
Thanks Sheila. I thought I would get a lot of heart ache over it. But everything I said is true. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #21
The IDF has mandatory service. MedicalAdmin Jan 2012 #25
If IDF is the Israeli Army SheilaT Jan 2012 #31
I'm concerned largely with having less missions. I also think that men and women are equal TheKentuckian Jan 2012 #22
Everyone has a right to their opinion including you. I just been around the military all my grown southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #23
Happy New Year, Chuckles! Nt xchrom Jan 2012 #2
Perhaps the country as a whole, but not DU. Robb Jan 2012 #3
No one here supports a war with Iran whatchamacallit Jan 2012 #5
Horse puckey. Robb Jan 2012 #7
Yep. Union Scribe Jan 2012 #14
I will not support the invasion of Iran no matter who the president is. If Israel wants to do it, southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #18
Ah, Chuckles is back. MineralMan Jan 2012 #6
Well, I don't know that the final score on the Libyan intervention has been written. MilesColtrane Jan 2012 #15
Yet again, Tom Tomorrow gets it. surrealAmerican Jan 2012 #10
Americans vote against their own interests Ichingcarpenter Jan 2012 #11
k&r pokerfan Jan 2012 #12
K&R Solly Mack Jan 2012 #13
K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Jan 2012 #16
Oh well! Live and learn! n/t leeroysphitz Jan 2012 #19
K&R (n/t) a2liberal Jan 2012 #24
Chuckles and . . . . well, who is the other Republican in Moderate clothing supposed to be? HughBeaumont Jan 2012 #26
Why, yes, as a matter of fact.......... eridani Jan 2012 #27
Brilliant. k&r n/t Laelth Jan 2012 #28
Looks like some of the pro ... GeorgeGist Jan 2012 #29
K&R! :D Fire Walk With Me Jan 2012 #30
 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
1. That's just about what happen. I wonder if we put a draft in and require all men including
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 11:11 AM
Jan 2012

politicans sons going to the front line would that make them stop and think? I bet it would. Old men are always happier to send someoneelse children.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
8. That will never happen. Ever until the ERA has finally passed some of the states. So far I think
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:05 PM
Jan 2012

they are about 5 states short. But even that much a majority of married women do not want to go to war with children at home. I just don't see that happening. Besides that I have been around to see what kind of a fallout that can cause. No I don't see that happening.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
9. It should be insisted on, it makes selling any war that much harder.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 12:15 PM
Jan 2012

Even a TeaPubliKlan will slow his roll if "Daddy's little girl" is probable cannonfodder. The rank and file anyway.

The society is fairly comfortable with boys in bodybags but a bit more squeamish with girls.

Hell, your reaction was indicitive of what I'm talking about. Women in bodybags and motherless children is a tough sale for many.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
17. Listen I have worked with the military. I know how SOME women play the system. To be perfectly
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 02:56 PM
Jan 2012

honest I believe once a woman has a child she needs to get out of the military. If she is married they husband or wife needs to make the choice. I am of the old school. I come from a family of lifers. Their attitude was if the military wanted you to have a wife they would have issued you one. I know I going to get alot of hate about it. But it is my personal belief. I say when my husband was stationed at Ft Campbell how unprepared many soldiers were about their families. What always bothered me is the recruiters would say the person they were trying to get in. You can give your parents temporary custody of your child or children (this is a single soldier I am talking about) and once you get your permanent assignment then you can get them back. I have seen it with my own eyes. This is a terrible policy. Soldiers need to worry about the mission. Now I know of some women who are great soldiers and even they don't like these kind of women who take advantage of their gender. I worked with a couple of girls that would use her period as an excuse. The other girl used her looks to get off and bragged about until she asked off once to often and she didn't get her way and accused the Captain of harassment. Not all women are like that but there are some. None the less I have no problem with women servicing. Yes I do have a problem with women in combat. Sorry that is how I feel. You have every right to disagree with me and I respect that. In the military MISSION always comes first. I would feel the same if there were a single man with a child.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
20. I agree with you.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 05:20 PM
Jan 2012

I honestly don't understand what women (and some men, especially those who themselves are single dads) are thinking of when they think the military is just like any other job and is compatible with home life.

MedicalAdmin

(4,143 posts)
25. The IDF has mandatory service.
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 06:22 AM
Jan 2012

All men serve 2 years and all women serve 1 year minimum. And those are all potential combat missions.

Does anyone here think the IDF are a week force?

It dan and should be done. The decision makers need skin in the game and I'm not talking about investments in Halliburton.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
31. If IDF is the Israeli Army
Wed Jan 4, 2012, 03:06 PM
Jan 2012

never forget that the Ultra Orthodox have a complete pass on serving.

And what does the Israeli Army have to do with the U.S. Army? If we actually had a universal draft I shudder to think how many wars would then be justified, how many more military bases would be built, how many more countries occupied.

The sad truth is that it is precisely our overgrown military and unrealistic military presence around the world that will lead to this country's eventual downfall. In all of the debate about how we can't afford Medicare or Social Security or even to repair roads and bridges in this country, the enormous size and reach of our military is almost never mentioned. There will come the day when we'll simply be a high-tech version of the collapsing Roman Empire.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
22. I'm concerned largely with having less missions. I also think that men and women are equal
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 05:37 PM
Jan 2012

in rights, obligations, duty, and responsibilities.

The two are a perfect match, folks like you will have a greatly reduced tolerance to missions that result in women in body bags and motherless children and equality under the law is greatly enhanced.

Less missions and everyone has skin in the games that do happen.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
23. Everyone has a right to their opinion including you. I just been around the military all my grown
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 07:37 PM
Jan 2012

life. I know there are so good women soldier but many women don't want to be in combat. They are being pushed by women who do want to be there. Now I think if a single woman or a man have children they should be mde to get out. If they are married then one or the other should be out. You say they are equal. Ok then why do they have different requirements for PT? There is a reason. There are some jobs women do better then men and vise a versa. I am not hating on women. Like I said it comes from years of observations. Personally I don't want my granddaughter going off to war or being in the military. Especially since the military in general can't seem to stop women from getting raped.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
3. Perhaps the country as a whole, but not DU.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 11:15 AM
Jan 2012

No one here supported the invasion of Iraq.

Less than half supported going into Afghanistan.

And no one here supports a war with Iran.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
7. Horse puckey.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 11:54 AM
Jan 2012

I'm one of DU's "hawks" in that I supported action in AfPak. We were in the minority then, and if anything we have become LESS convinced it was a good idea since Obama took office, not more.

War with Iran is folly, and fortunately everyone in any sort of power position agrees.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
14. Yep.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 02:28 PM
Jan 2012

We'd hear about how he was forced to, how it's a humanitarian move (why do you hate those women being stoned????), how it'll mostly be drones so our troops are safer, etc etc. Basically, the exact same arguments used to justify his expansion of Afghanistan, his dawdling in Iraq, drone bombings, Libya. We've already SEEN that many will flip on war and go full rah-rah if they support the person waging it.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
18. I will not support the invasion of Iran no matter who the president is. If Israel wants to do it,
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 02:59 PM
Jan 2012

then let them do it. I support only Afghanistan until we got OBL. Once they got him Mission Accomplished time to come home.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
6. Ah, Chuckles is back.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 11:49 AM
Jan 2012

However, I have to disagree with the pragmatic woodchuck. Nothing good has ever come from our meddling in the Middle East. I think we should stop doing it completely. In fact, I'd be in favor of drastic cuts in our overseas military operations worldwide.

MilesColtrane

(18,678 posts)
15. Well, I don't know that the final score on the Libyan intervention has been written.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 02:30 PM
Jan 2012

So, we've got that going for us.

But seriously, we do need to GTFO of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
11. Americans vote against their own interests
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 01:11 PM
Jan 2012

be it war, health care, infrastructure etc

They just need to be lead like sheep to where
their corporate/military / media shepard wants to take them.

I think that's his point... and like always
He gets it.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
26. Chuckles and . . . . well, who is the other Republican in Moderate clothing supposed to be?
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 06:43 AM
Jan 2012

Never figured that one out.

K & R.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sensible thinkers - by T...