Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:18 PM Mar 2018

The Second Amendment crowd is as dishonest as they are crazy.

Ninety percent of the conversation being held today has nothing to do with the Second Amendment. They are simply attempting to claim we oppose the constitutional. Just about every reform being mentioned on a large scale is one hundred percent constitutionally grounded. Codified by the courts already.

They are the ones attempting to subvert the constitution. Not us.

The Second Amendment is not an absolute right to own a gun. Not even close. Our Second Amendment friends don't understand the constitution and court system, period.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Second Amendment crowd is as dishonest as they are crazy. (Original Post) NCTraveler Mar 2018 OP
No one is claiming the 2nd is an absolute right any more than there are folks looking to ban all gun aikoaiko Mar 2018 #1
It is absolutely being referenced by many as an absolute right. NCTraveler Mar 2018 #2
Making the case that someone is taking an anti-2nd A position is not the same thing... aikoaiko Mar 2018 #4
Go to any gun nut website... Adrahil Mar 2018 #6
Yes, I can find people who want to ban all or restrict none on the internet. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #7
Completely banning a women's choice is also called "a position not to be taken seriously..." LanternWaste Mar 2018 #11
Only when pushed up against the wall. NRA and most supporters who are too cheap to pay dues, say Hoyt Mar 2018 #13
You are lucky you don't have to hear people spewing these extremes. I hear it all the time. AgadorSparticus Mar 2018 #15
Yeah, yeah they are ... they don't have a right to own an AR-15 or any other war weapon at ... uponit7771 Mar 2018 #16
I just love the owning a gun is my god given right excuse.... Heartstrings Mar 2018 #3
Those claims are based on a long history of Natural Law legal reasoning. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #5
...and pretty useless... Adrahil Mar 2018 #10
The 2nd Amendment crowd merged with the paranoid conspiracy theory wing of the GOP. Initech Mar 2018 #8
Crazy gun humpers. nt LexVegas Mar 2018 #9
Yeah, but they can identify bolt catch springs vs. hammer springs and are OCD about gun nomenclature Hoyt Mar 2018 #12
Scare tactics. moondust Mar 2018 #14

aikoaiko

(34,186 posts)
1. No one is claiming the 2nd is an absolute right any more than there are folks looking to ban all gun
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:24 PM
Mar 2018

At least I don't see any serious folks taking either extreme positions.

But there can be legitimate differences of opinions on what access to firearms, if any, should be protected when protecting the people's right to keep and bear arms.

*editing to avoid taking verbal shortcuts

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
2. It is absolutely being referenced by many as an absolute right.
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:48 PM
Mar 2018

There is no question about that. News program after news program has NRA lackeys and gun humpers on them talking about the anti-second amendment crowd. When the people they are referencing are discussing things that are clearly constitutional, they are making an absolutist argument.

aikoaiko

(34,186 posts)
4. Making the case that someone is taking an anti-2nd A position is not the same thing...
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:54 PM
Mar 2018

...as claiming an absolutist stance on the RKBA.

It does seem like there are a lot of people who want to caricaturize the other side.
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
6. Go to any gun nut website...
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:00 PM
Mar 2018

It is a common talking point that "shall not be infringed" means it's an absolute, unlimited right. They are nuts.

aikoaiko

(34,186 posts)
7. Yes, I can find people who want to ban all or restrict none on the internet.
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:03 PM
Mar 2018

But neither position can be taken seriously.

I frequent a couple of gun rights forums and most people who post support some limits or restrictions.





 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
11. Completely banning a women's choice is also called "a position not to be taken seriously..."
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:27 PM
Mar 2018

Completely banning a women's choice is also called "a position not to be taken seriously..." when particular narratives are not being reinforced by events or by reality.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
13. Only when pushed up against the wall. NRA and most supporters who are too cheap to pay dues, say
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:41 PM
Mar 2018

"from my cold dead hands."

And, a big swatch of gunners are big into Molon Labe (come and take em) intimidation.


Care to share any names of the gun rights forums you frequent? Would love to quote some of their comments/posts.

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
15. You are lucky you don't have to hear people spewing these extremes. I hear it all the time.
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 04:26 PM
Mar 2018

All the pro gun nuts seem to say the same thing: I will be cold and dead before I let you come take my guns. They NEVER talk about background checks, mental health checks, assault weapons, etc. NEVER. It is about their god given right and constitutional right to stockpile whatever they want.

uponit7771

(90,370 posts)
16. Yeah, yeah they are ... they don't have a right to own an AR-15 or any other war weapon at ...
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 04:32 PM
Mar 2018

... every setting but the language they use is filled with such rights

Heartstrings

(7,349 posts)
3. I just love the owning a gun is my god given right excuse....
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:51 PM
Mar 2018

No, no I don't.....no where does God state it is your right to own anything!

aikoaiko

(34,186 posts)
5. Those claims are based on a long history of Natural Law legal reasoning.
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 01:58 PM
Mar 2018

I''m not really qualified to elaborate, but its interesting reading.
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
10. ...and pretty useless...
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:24 PM
Mar 2018

The 18th century concept of "natural law" uses a kind of "self evidence" argument. But the problem with that argument is there is no actual textual basis for it.

Initech

(100,132 posts)
8. The 2nd Amendment crowd merged with the paranoid conspiracy theory wing of the GOP.
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:05 PM
Mar 2018

This is what happens when the inmates have been let out of the asylum.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
12. Yeah, but they can identify bolt catch springs vs. hammer springs and are OCD about gun nomenclature
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 02:28 PM
Mar 2018

and they like rattling off their opinion about the best ammo to kill teenagers vs. obese old guys. It's impressive.



Just in case--

moondust

(20,023 posts)
14. Scare tactics.
Mon Mar 26, 2018, 03:04 PM
Mar 2018

I'm ashamed to admit that I have a gun wacko cousin who posted a scary gun control image on Facebook that he apparently got from some crazy Ted Cruz website. It's the old Holocaust meme that tries to scare people into thinking that gun control could lead to another Holocaust, similar to this:



I pointed him to the Wikipedia examination of that meme that notes how "preposterous" it is to argue that the Jews, who constituted only one percent of the German population, could have somehow saved themselves if they had only had more guns.

Crazy, dishonest, and utterly despicable to try to use the Holocaust to scare people away from sensible gun control. I thought by now with all the information available to the Average Joe that most people would know that other countries don't have anywhere near the recurring gun tragedies that the U.S. has because of its insane gun culture. I was wrong.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Second Amendment crow...