General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton Will Star In GOP Midterm Plan
Fox News: Clinton is starring in the Republican Partys 2018 midterm strategy. With no Democrat to attack in the White House for the first time in nearly a decade, Republicans are betting big that the ghost of Clinton will serve them well in 2018.
Even if she avoids the spotlight moving forward, the Republican Party plans to evoke her early and often in key congressional races, particularly in regions Trump won, which feature most of the midterm seasons competitive races.
Internal polling and focus groups conducted by Republican campaigns find that Clinton remains one of the most unpopular high-profile Democrats in the nation, second only to Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader.
https://politicalwire.com/2018/04/22/hillary-clinton-will-star-in-gop-midterm-plan/
riversedge
(70,306 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,216 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Always rolling out the same old same old.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)Doodley
(9,129 posts)Proud liberal 80
(4,167 posts)Was an article from the Onion or Borowitz report
renegade000
(2,301 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)And thanks for the help in the midterms!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)HRC remains the most admired woman in America and...
The 5th most admired woman in the world
Maybe they should be polling other than the diehards
Or ask a question different than..."Do you think HRC is horrible?"
LenaBaby61
(6,977 posts)Well, many in the media and some in the print press are OBSESSED with that deplorable 30-35% (Fatso's base). Screw Democrats, Independents, Women, Minorities, the young certain income voters etc. It's all about that 30-35% of tRumputin's deplorable base and how THEY feel about their Dear Leader
Me.
(35,454 posts)Makes sense...
LenaBaby61
(6,977 posts)Exactly!!!!
TDale313
(7,820 posts)And these districts are so gerrymandered that die hards are the only ones GOP House members think they need to worry about. Not a winning strategy to become/stay relevant as a national party- but may save a few red seats from going blue and that may be all they can hope for right now.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)the GOP's 2018 Election theme. Sure it scored highest in his Focus Groups.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)Shes been their bogey(wo)man for nearly three decades. Its bullshit, but it brings in the $$$ for them and fires up their base, so of course theyre going there. Its not like they got anything positive to run on.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)GOP has absolutely nothing - not even a viable enemy to hate. What a big yawn the GOP has become. Maybe some Republicans will yawn and say "why bother?" on election day.
Takket
(21,629 posts)Despite all that has been said about drumpf there has been zero sympathy for Clinton in the MSM. she remains a hated figure for not taking responsibility for her own bad campaign.
Despite the fact she did... and it wasnt her fault Putin had her overthrown in favor of his puppet.
They spent that entire election season creating a Pavlovian response to the name Clinton and I see No reason to believe Clinton Derangememt Syndrome wont serve them again.
onetexan
(13,061 posts)Ones fears what one doesn't know. The RW are afraid of a smart, hawkish, confident woman whose more qualified for the presidency than any man.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)comes up with a strategy for how to stop it.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Nope.
They've spent the last 30 years creating a Pavlovian response to the name Clinton.
The media has carried water for the right-wing's anti-Clinton smears and hit jobs for years, and that is why people feel the way they do about her.
Takket
(21,629 posts)UCmeNdc
(9,601 posts)Take them to court every time. If they publically say you lie, you like sex with children, you stole money, etc. You take them to court.
BeyondGeography
(39,380 posts)All she has to do is stay home and they lose.
jalan48
(13,886 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,380 posts)Just dont take the bait.
jalan48
(13,886 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 23, 2018, 11:54 AM - Edit history (1)
they have done with Pelosi. The politics of hate has really taken a foothold in our country. Instead of debating issues they are making it about personalities.
BeyondGeography
(39,380 posts)She wont do anything to help them. Id prefer she didnt campaign at all, tbh.
emulatorloo
(44,186 posts)argyl
(3,064 posts)She was cheated of the Presidency in 2016, graciously accepted the results and has announced she has no plans to run for President again.
And the GOP is going to beat up on her yet again?
Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.
They think that's their ticket to success in 2018?Yeah, it'll play well with the Deplorables but they're already on board.
They'll be going to the well once too often this time. Talk about the reek and flop sweat of desperation.
Nothing lasts forever, numbskulls. This scary Hillary bullshit is getting old and weak.
FakeNoose
(32,767 posts)...Saccone was apparently running against Nancy Pelosi! Even though Pelosi never came to Pennsylvania or even endorsed Lamb, she was Saccone's opponent in all the local TV ads. It was ridiculous, the GOP couldn't get it out of their heads.
Needless to say it's a useless strategy, which is I'm sure the reason why they're using it across the nation by next fall. Only instead of Pelosi this time the strawman will be Hillary. What a bunch of lost souls they are!
Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)It fires up their base. It is clearly and absolutely their best bet on achieving this requirement.
Unfortunately for them, in order to actually win much they're also going to have to benefit voters at some point, which would be so completely out of character we don't need to worry about it.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)Oh, right - you mean providing public services for the people of this nation, or what Republicans call "pandering."
Republicans only provide services and benefits for the wealthy corporatists, but they're not voters; they're owners.
=========
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)By filming commercials for 3 or 4 republican candidates in which she compliments each of them for several things - Sec Clinton should release the commercials near the end of September!
The republicans will $hit themselves because Sec Clinton has said good things about their candidates and will go broke trying to explain to their idiot voters that the candidates are republicans and not Dems...
still_one
(92,409 posts)anything, while the Democratic candidate in that respective state or district will be campaigning on issues that will actually affect people in their state.
So far whatever strategy the republicans have been using sure hasn't worked very well, and this included some of the reddest states around
It will be interesting if the republicans running in 2018 are going to ask trump to campaign for them......
Mike Nelson
(9,967 posts)...the deplorables who were going to get out and vote come Hell or high water will get out and vote! I hope the advertising campaign spends a lot of money on this effort.
JHB
(37,162 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,014 posts)At least it was a couple weeks ago. They change their minds ?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Where is the beautiful health care for all, much cheaper than Obama care?
Where is the peace you promised vs "warmonger Hillary"?
Where are all the coal mining jobs? Where are all the factory jobs? Paying a middle class paycheck, not walmart wages.
All they got to show is a budget busting massive tax cut for big business and billionaires.
GOP is gonna get its fat ass kicked hard this fall!
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)if it tries this. Did Luntz's focus groups tell them to campaign on the Tax Heist, I wonder? Actually trying to do that has so far given them a nasty shock.
This is obviously meant to reassure and boost turnout by feeding its "red in tooth and nail" base what it wants.
But what else? Are they really driven to just securing their conservative "redoubts"? Or is this a way of securing them without spending money needed elsewhere?
They're not stupid and the stakes and battle for power are enormous.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Dog whistling, blatant racism, blatant sexism, demonization of certain 'liberals'...that's been the Republican playbook for 50 years. All while bashing the "liberal media," which has worked like a charm (the mainstream media promotes false equivalencies and has become too afraid to identify facts as facts and falsehoods as falsehoods). Republicans have been suffering a lot of losses since Trump took office, because Trump (who is just a symptom of the aforementioned playbook) is such an extremely dangerous and outlandish individual. But, make no mistake, that Republican strategy has paid many dividends. And it's all they've got.
Absent that strategy, the GOP would go extinct. Absent racism alone, the GOP would go extinct. Support for right wing economics, right wing environmental policy and right wing foreign policy would be minimal. Those who bemoan people "voting against their economic interests" need to understand that those folks are voting *for* their (perceived) cultural/social interests. Alter the latter and you put an end to the former. The struggle to combat racism and sexism (structural/institutional and individual) is vital. Those who attack "identity politics" are severely misguided.