Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn One Hannity Interview, Giuliani Blew Up Trump's Arguments in 3 Legal Cases
May 3, 2018 1:47 am
In One Hannity Interview, Giuliani Blew Up Trumps Arguments in 3 Legal Cases
By Margaret Hartmann
Two weeks ago, President Trump finally found a new attorney to lead the understaffed team handling his response to the Russia probe: his old friend Rudy Giuliani. Through public statements, apparent leaks, and the exit of White House lawyer Ty Cobb (who advocated for cooperation with Robert Mueller), the former New York mayor signaled that he was cleaning up Trumps legal team. From now on, they would be a unified force making aggressive, carefully calculated moves to undermine the special counsel.
Then in his very first TV interview as Trumps attorney, with Trump shadow adviser Sean Hannity no less, Giuliani contradicted the presidents stories on potential obstruction of justice, the Stormy Daniels affair, and even his relationship with fixer Michael Cohen.
In response to Hannitys first softball whats the status of the Russia investigation Giuliani basically confirmed that he leaked Muellers questions for Trump (which were actually composed by the presidents attorneys) as part of an effort to paint the special counsel as unfairly biased. Then he offered up a brand-new explanation for why Trump fired FBI director James Comey:
He fired Comey because he would not, among other things, say that he was not a target of the investigation. Hes entitled to that. Hillary Clinton got that, and he couldnt get that. So he fired him, and he said Im free of this guy and he went on Lester Holt
[Trump] said I did it because I felt that I had to explain to the American people their president was not the target of the investigation.
Many pundits were quick to note that firing Comey because he wouldnt say what Trump wanted about the Russia investigation sounds like the very definition of obstruction of justice. But Giulianis statement is like an onion of legal errors. It also contradicts two of Trumps previous explanations for Comeys firing.
more...
https://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/05/on-hannity-giuliani-blows-up-trumps-arguments-in-3-cases.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1099 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In One Hannity Interview, Giuliani Blew Up Trump's Arguments in 3 Legal Cases (Original Post)
babylonsister
May 2018
OP
shraby
(21,946 posts)1. When the hannity interview news broke on O'Donnell's show I started laughing and didn't
stop until I went to bed after Brian Williams was over. It was the most delightful news I've heard in a long time.
UpInArms
(51,283 posts)2. Only the best, he said