Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sun May 6, 2018, 10:10 AM May 2018

Sam Stein and David Corn on Trump's Mistress Slush Fund, Cohen, and the NDA

Sam Stein

Verified account

@samstein

If Trump can prove that he had a slush fund for paying out hush money for his extramarital affairs that he put under Cohen’s control and never really checked in to see how it was being paid out, then yes…. they’re in the clear.

6:36 AM - 6 May 2018




David Corn

Verified account

@DavidCornDC
David Corn Retweeted Sam Stein
But the NDA would not be enforceable.


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sam Stein and David Corn on Trump's Mistress Slush Fund, Cohen, and the NDA (Original Post) Miles Archer May 2018 OP
depends on source of the funds of the slush fund as well as timeline of payouts beachbum bob May 2018 #1
I think this is Rudy's MontanaMama May 2018 #2
 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
1. depends on source of the funds of the slush fund as well as timeline of payouts
Sun May 6, 2018, 10:15 AM
May 2018

if during an election cycle and prior to the voting, any payouts would be consider "in-kind" services and subject to FEC rules and reporting. If slush fund monies were gathered in a way and paid out in a manner against the law then its considered money laundering...the finances will send the trumps to prison....always follow the money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sam Stein and David Corn ...