Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHistorian: Trump's style of governance classifies as "sadopopulism".
https://www.salon.com/2018/05/09/timothy-snyder-on-trumps-campaign-against-democracy-he-is-deliberately-hurting-white-people/Sadopopulism is the notion that youre doing half of populism. You promise people things, but then when you get power you have no intention of even trying to implement any policy on behalf of the people. Instead, you deliberately make the suffering worse for your critical constituency. The people who got Trump into office, for example, are traditional Republican voters plus people in counties who are doing badly in terms of health care and other measures, and who need help.
Under Trump, of course, things will just get worse in terms of both the opioid addictions and in terms of wealth inequality. But thats OK, because the logic of sadopopulism is that pain is a resource. Sadopopulist leaders like Trump use that pain to create a story about whos actually at fault. The way politics works in that model is that government doesnt solve your problems, it blames your problems on other people and it creates the cycle that goes around over and over and over again. I started talking about sadopopulism because I got tired of people talking about populism.
It just seems like populism doesnt capture a specific American racial and oligarchic situation where people like Trump come to power, promising that the government is going to do something and then, in power, deliberately do nothing positive.
Not so long ago the currency of government was achievement. Government had to do something. Now, the currency of government is discourse. Government has to make you feel worse about people around you. Thats an achievement.
...
One of the truths that is rarely stated in American public discourse is that the welfare state exists to sustain a more or less politically reasonable middle class. You break the welfare state in this country in order to make the white people crazy. You dont do it to punish the black people. Thats what you say youre doing and maybe you take a pleasure in doing that. But ultimately what youre doing when you break the welfare state in this country is that youre hurting white people. Trump and his allies can then direct that vulnerability for political ends.
Under Trump, of course, things will just get worse in terms of both the opioid addictions and in terms of wealth inequality. But thats OK, because the logic of sadopopulism is that pain is a resource. Sadopopulist leaders like Trump use that pain to create a story about whos actually at fault. The way politics works in that model is that government doesnt solve your problems, it blames your problems on other people and it creates the cycle that goes around over and over and over again. I started talking about sadopopulism because I got tired of people talking about populism.
It just seems like populism doesnt capture a specific American racial and oligarchic situation where people like Trump come to power, promising that the government is going to do something and then, in power, deliberately do nothing positive.
Not so long ago the currency of government was achievement. Government had to do something. Now, the currency of government is discourse. Government has to make you feel worse about people around you. Thats an achievement.
...
One of the truths that is rarely stated in American public discourse is that the welfare state exists to sustain a more or less politically reasonable middle class. You break the welfare state in this country in order to make the white people crazy. You dont do it to punish the black people. Thats what you say youre doing and maybe you take a pleasure in doing that. But ultimately what youre doing when you break the welfare state in this country is that youre hurting white people. Trump and his allies can then direct that vulnerability for political ends.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1774 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (24)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Historian: Trump's style of governance classifies as "sadopopulism". (Original Post)
DetlefK
May 2018
OP
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)1. The original article here:
https://www.salon.com/2018/05/09/timothy-snyder-on-trumps-campaign-against-democracy-he-is-deliberately-hurting-white-people/
Don't bother with clickbait Raw Story; go to the source.
Don't bother with clickbait Raw Story; go to the source.
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)4. +1
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)2. Good term
I've never heard it before, but it makes sense.
I also know of some Trump supporters that figured Trump was going to screw them over, but that Trump would screw over "the other guy" worse than them, so they were okay with it. (of course, the "other guy" is minorities) Democrats, it seems, would screw over everybody equally and that was bad.
roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)3. Excellent
Very fine analysis.
Martin Eden
(12,867 posts)5. Sadopopulism
Could the term "masopopulism" be applied to those who know they're getting screwed by Trump but support him anyway?
iscooterliberally
(2,860 posts)6. This and apparently just under half of us think that torture is OK.
I was listening to NPR on my way to work this morning and they were interviewing someone from the CIA regarding the appointment of Gina Haspel.