General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRick Perry suggests using 'national security' to override opposition to pipelines
Energy secretary comes from a state very protective of its sovereignty.
MARK HAND MAY 9, 2018, 1:50 PM
With states standing in the way of new natural gas pipelines, Energy Secretary Rick Perry on Wednesday suggested elevating the role of national security when regulators consider whether to approve pipeline project applications.
Testifying on Capitol Hill, Perry expressed frustration with the failure of pipelines to get built due to opposition from state officials. Perry Texas longest-serving governor questioned the power that states hold over the construction of oil and natural gas pipelines. Do states have the right to block a pipeline across their state that will have a national security implication or an economic implication on individuals? Perry asked.
Perry told members of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, that he believes a fight is brewing over a states sovereign ability to make a decision versus the national security of this country.
New York regulators, in particular, have most recently been taking a closer look at the environmental impact of natural gas pipelines that would travel through their state. Most states, in contrast, offer lax oversight of pipeline construction.
https://thinkprogress.org/perry-cites-national-security-in-defense-of-pipelines-446a7fcf088b/
dameatball
(7,397 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)a higher profit. This is about rich people's greed, not 'national security'. The GOP is all over States Rights, but not when it comes to their favorite donors in the fossil fuel biz. Maybe Perry's main concern is that he and his chums aren't going to get enough bribe money if those Big Oil guys can't rake in more profits.
backtoblue
(11,343 posts)Bottom line. The oh mighty dollar is all the GOP cares about.