Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNance Greggs: Civil Rights for Some
Love you, Nance!!http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2012/07/31/civil-rights-for-some/
Civil Rights for Some
By NanceGreggs, on July 31st, 2012
An Open Letter to the Reverend William Owens
Sir:
Having just read your remarks at the National Press Club this morning, I felt compelled to write you about your truly appalling comments.
Lets begin with: The President is in the White House because of the civil rights movement
No, sir. This President is in the White House because a majority of the citizens of this country saw him as the best man for the job, and cast their votes accordingly. The civil rights movement made the presidency of a black American possible, although it seemed a distant possibility at the time. But Barack Obama earned his presidency in the same way white American presidents have earned it in the past by presenting his vision of a better nation, and garnering the support of those who believed in that vision and his ability to make it a reality.
I was a leader in that movement, and I didnt march one inch, one foot, one yard for a man to marry a man or a woman to marry a woman.
That begs the question, sir: Exactly who did you march for? Was it for all black Americans, or only those you personally approved of? Was it for every man and every woman who was being denied their rights, or was it only for those whose rights you deemed acceptable? Was it for your fellow citizens who deserved equality in the eyes of the law, or was it only for those who you determined were deserving in the eyes of the Lord you claim to represent?
snip//
Just for the sake of completeness, Reverend, I would add that true Christians strive to adhere to the Ten Commandments, along with the teachings of Jesus Christ. Can you point me to the Commandment that forbids homosexuality, or the passages from the New Testament that quotes Jesus condemnation thereof?
Of course, we both know that no such Commandment exists, nor did Jesus say any such thing. But people like yourself see fit to speak for God and Jesus alike, which means your ignorance is only surpassed by your arrogance in presuming to speak for either.
With all due respect (which is now irrevocably non-existent),
Nance Greggs
Having just read your remarks at the National Press Club this morning, I felt compelled to write you about your truly appalling comments.
Lets begin with: The President is in the White House because of the civil rights movement
No, sir. This President is in the White House because a majority of the citizens of this country saw him as the best man for the job, and cast their votes accordingly. The civil rights movement made the presidency of a black American possible, although it seemed a distant possibility at the time. But Barack Obama earned his presidency in the same way white American presidents have earned it in the past by presenting his vision of a better nation, and garnering the support of those who believed in that vision and his ability to make it a reality.
I was a leader in that movement, and I didnt march one inch, one foot, one yard for a man to marry a man or a woman to marry a woman.
That begs the question, sir: Exactly who did you march for? Was it for all black Americans, or only those you personally approved of? Was it for every man and every woman who was being denied their rights, or was it only for those whose rights you deemed acceptable? Was it for your fellow citizens who deserved equality in the eyes of the law, or was it only for those who you determined were deserving in the eyes of the Lord you claim to represent?
snip//
Just for the sake of completeness, Reverend, I would add that true Christians strive to adhere to the Ten Commandments, along with the teachings of Jesus Christ. Can you point me to the Commandment that forbids homosexuality, or the passages from the New Testament that quotes Jesus condemnation thereof?
Of course, we both know that no such Commandment exists, nor did Jesus say any such thing. But people like yourself see fit to speak for God and Jesus alike, which means your ignorance is only surpassed by your arrogance in presuming to speak for either.
With all due respect (which is now irrevocably non-existent),
Nance Greggs
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1715 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nance Greggs: Civil Rights for Some (Original Post)
babylonsister
Aug 2012
OP
part man all 86
(367 posts)1. Love that last line, because no human speaks for Elohim.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,608 posts)2. Nothing to add, but K&R...
I'm right there with you, my dear babylonsister...Love you, Nance!
PDJane
(10,103 posts)3. My HERO!!!!!!
spanone
(135,830 posts)4. D""A""M""N k&r
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)5. K&R
This should be sent far and wide.
Nice job Nance
Spazito
(50,326 posts)6. Great OP!
Great read!
DCKit
(18,541 posts)7. That's our Nance... clarity of thought and cuttin' through the BS to the core of the issue. nt
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)8. "With all due respect..."
With all due respect (which is now irrevocably non-existent),