Computer scientists have strong evidence election was rigged against Clinton in 3 key states

[HipChick]

Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania were potentially manipulated, according to prominent computer scientists and lawyers who have spoken with the Clinton campaign

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

[mcar]

1. This doesn't surprise me a bit

What will is if the MSM pays even a bit of attention to it.

[manor321]

2. That's an article from 2016 n/t

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

3. Little dated... article from 2016. But, hey, if you're suggesting Hillary should seek a recount...

at this late date, I'm all for it!

[Hoyt]

4. Why repeat excuses from 2016? We lost because we didn't GOTV, people voted for Stein or even trump,

people sat on their rear because their candidate didn't win the primary, etc.

Look what that got us. Hope we learned our lesson.

[jmg257]

5. You do realize that is almost 2 years old? NO EVIDENCE WAS FOUND!!

"while they have not found conclusive evidence of a hack, the pattern in their results merits an independent review"

Been there did that - not an issue.

[Achilleaze]

6. republicans betrayed America and American democracy

lock them up

[longship]

7. Michigan has statewide paper ballots.

Losing an election is not a sole criterium to be able to claim that it was rigged. One has to have actual evidence.

[DetroitLegalBeagle]

10. Yep

The only machines used are the tabulators, which just make counting quicker. The original paper ballot is still stored physically in the machine in case an audit is necessary. From what I remember hearing there were some issues with a few older tabulators double counting, but it was isolated in a heavily democratic detroit precinct, and only to a couple of the oldest tabulators. They hand counted the affected ballots.

[lostnfound]

11. They were Unable to recount because of possible fraudulent activity

If a recount of paper ballots show that the total number of ballots is not the same as the original tabulated total, then the recount is not used and you go with the original numbers.

Some boxes were opened, or seal broken, and therefore they couldn’t actually do a recount.

[malaise]

8. They stole it - history will absolve me

I knew that on election night

[mythology]

9. No they didn't

Wisconsin partially recounted by hand. It showed no statistical difference from the machine recounted counties. The biggest issue was user error such as not fully filling the circle.

There is zero evidence votes were changed.

[triron]

12. Exit poll analysis by Ron Baiman Ph. D. also supports this evidence.

[triron]

13. kick for visibility

[triron]

14. kick again

[ucrdem]

15. TIME: Election Hackers Altered Voter Rolls, Stole Private Data, Officials Say

By MASSIMO CALABRESI June 22, 2017

The hacking of state and local election databases in 2016 was more extensive than previously reported, including at least one successful attempt to alter voter information, and the theft of thousands of voter records that contain private information like partial Social Security numbers, current and former officials tell TIME.

In one case, investigators found there had been a manipulation of voter data in a county database but the alterations were discovered and rectified, two sources familiar with the matter tell TIME. Investigators have not identified whether the hackers in that case were Russian agents.

http://time.com/4828306/russian-hacking-election-widespread-private-data/

So what about the manipulations that weren't discovered and rectified? And how come PA and MI refused to fulfill their legal obligation to provide vote recounts to a candidate who met all the deadlines and payed all the fees?

[triron]

16. kick for visibility