Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIronic that this combined Supreme Court case restricts rights of workers to join in class action
suits to fight for their rights.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is absolutely correct in noting this decision is egregiously wrong.
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Workers Rights in 5-4 Decision Against Collective Action
https://www.democracynow.org/2018/5/23/supreme_court_deals_blow_to_workers
In a major blow to workers rights, the Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 Monday that employers can use arbitration clauses to prohibit workers from banding together to challenge violations of federal labor laws in class-action lawsuits. Arbitration is often confidential. Many workers may agree to mandatory arbitration clauses without even being aware of it when they sign a contract with their employer. In a rare show of public displeasure, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg read her dissent from the bench, calling the majority opinion egregiously wrong and saying, The court today holds enforceable these arm-twisted, take-it-or-leave-it contractsincluding the provisions requiring employees to litigate wage and hours claims only one-by-one. Federal labor law does not countenance such isolation of employees. For more, we speak with Terri Gerstein, former labor bureau chief for the New York State Attorney Generals Office.
~~~
TERRI GERSTEIN: Well, the real significance of this case, I think, is that many, many workersmost workersespecially low-wage workers, will simply not be able to get justice when they experience wage theft or race discrimination, sexual harassment. The decision, as you said, decides that employers are allowed to force workers, through arbitration agreements, to give up their rights to bring a class action. And that is such a problem, first of all, because workers always get strength in bringing cases together. This is both because theyre afraid to bring cases often, because of retaliation, but if its a group, it gives more protection from retaliation.
Its also true because of the economics of bringing a case. If you think about how much a minimum-wage case might be worththe federal minimum wage is $7.25, even the places where the minimum wage is $15 an hourif a worker is not paid a hundred hours, that doesnt add up to very much money. And it still takes a lot of work for a lawyer to do these cases. So the only way the economics of these cases work for private lawyers to bring cases is to aggregate them into a class action. And it will benow that workersemployers are free to require workers to give up their right to bring a class action, I think it will be extremely hard for workers to find lawyers who can afford to take these cases.
~~~
TERRI GERSTEIN: Right. Its really interesting, when you look at the actual underlying cases, because these were actually three cases that were combined. In one of them, the arbitration agreement was actually part of the job application itself, so you couldnt even apply for the job without agreeing to arbitration. In another couple of the cases, workers who were already working at that company suddenly got an email saying, Heres your new arbitration agreement. By continuing to work here, you are agreeing to this agreement. So, and as you said, for a lot of people, its just in the very beginning, when you get a mountain of paperwork or, in some places, touchscreens, and you just sign everything. People dont have the opportunity to really review it, to understand what theyre giving up. And theyre not really getting anything in exchange for signing this arbitration agreement and giving up their right to bring a class action. All they get is the right to have the job.
~~~
TERRI GERSTEIN: Well, the real significance of this case, I think, is that many, many workersmost workersespecially low-wage workers, will simply not be able to get justice when they experience wage theft or race discrimination, sexual harassment. The decision, as you said, decides that employers are allowed to force workers, through arbitration agreements, to give up their rights to bring a class action. And that is such a problem, first of all, because workers always get strength in bringing cases together. This is both because theyre afraid to bring cases often, because of retaliation, but if its a group, it gives more protection from retaliation.
Its also true because of the economics of bringing a case. If you think about how much a minimum-wage case might be worththe federal minimum wage is $7.25, even the places where the minimum wage is $15 an hourif a worker is not paid a hundred hours, that doesnt add up to very much money. And it still takes a lot of work for a lawyer to do these cases. So the only way the economics of these cases work for private lawyers to bring cases is to aggregate them into a class action. And it will benow that workersemployers are free to require workers to give up their right to bring a class action, I think it will be extremely hard for workers to find lawyers who can afford to take these cases.
~~~
TERRI GERSTEIN: Right. Its really interesting, when you look at the actual underlying cases, because these were actually three cases that were combined. In one of them, the arbitration agreement was actually part of the job application itself, so you couldnt even apply for the job without agreeing to arbitration. In another couple of the cases, workers who were already working at that company suddenly got an email saying, Heres your new arbitration agreement. By continuing to work here, you are agreeing to this agreement. So, and as you said, for a lot of people, its just in the very beginning, when you get a mountain of paperwork or, in some places, touchscreens, and you just sign everything. People dont have the opportunity to really review it, to understand what theyre giving up. And theyre not really getting anything in exchange for signing this arbitration agreement and giving up their right to bring a class action. All they get is the right to have the job.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 538 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post