Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1401 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
About Comey & the NY Field Office (Original Post)
MelissaB
Jun 2018
OP
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)1. From Susan Hennessey at Lawfare Blog
Link to tweet
What happened in the FBI New York Field Office is one of the most overlooked and crucial factors on 2016.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)2. From Joe Scarborough just now
Link to tweet
It was an open secret during the campaign that many in the FBI office in New York hated Clinton. Just like many in the FBI and CIA hated Obama. Like a cadre in the CIA loathed Bush 43. And they all leaked. For Trump backers to act like snowflakes over some FBI texts is laughable.
EndGOPPropaganda
(1,117 posts)3. Huge news. More stuff here
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
And Josh Marshall:
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/more-evidence-of-the-critical-failure-of-the-ig-report
Now, in fairness, this Attorney General Lynchs account. She was a political appointee in a Democratic administration. So it might be fair to assume she would be sympathetic to Clinton. But she was also speaking to to a DOJ investigator. Shes a career DOJ official. And critically she was describing her recollection of Comeys words, not hers. It seems highly likely that some form of this conversation did take place: one in which both discussed the reality of deep animus against Secretary Clinton among a key group of FBI agents in the New York field office, ones who felt unbounded by supervision by FBI officials or Main Justice.
Everyone involved but Comey says the decision to send the letter was highly informed by the fear the news would be leaked leaks that pretty much by definition had to come from that New York field office. Indeed, in Comeys account of this meeting he himself seems to implicitly grant the role of leaks in the decision
....
And yet this critical question remains all but unexplored in the Report itself. As I noted at the top, its a sort of bureaucratic masterpiece. At least a lot of raw data isnt concealed. Its simply ignored. At the end of the day it really looks like the Inspector General investigated the questions President Trump and Attorney General Sessions wanted investigated. To his credit, he looked at those questions and did not pretend to find what Trump and Sessions clearly wanted him to find. But he simply ignored the questions which were unhelpful whether the investigations were tainted by anti-Clinton animus, and particularly whether it was behind the October 28th Comey Letter.
This requires an explanation and on its face looks like a dereliction of duty.
Everyone involved but Comey says the decision to send the letter was highly informed by the fear the news would be leaked leaks that pretty much by definition had to come from that New York field office. Indeed, in Comeys account of this meeting he himself seems to implicitly grant the role of leaks in the decision
....
And yet this critical question remains all but unexplored in the Report itself. As I noted at the top, its a sort of bureaucratic masterpiece. At least a lot of raw data isnt concealed. Its simply ignored. At the end of the day it really looks like the Inspector General investigated the questions President Trump and Attorney General Sessions wanted investigated. To his credit, he looked at those questions and did not pretend to find what Trump and Sessions clearly wanted him to find. But he simply ignored the questions which were unhelpful whether the investigations were tainted by anti-Clinton animus, and particularly whether it was behind the October 28th Comey Letter.
This requires an explanation and on its face looks like a dereliction of duty.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)4. Thanks!