General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcCain folk saw Mitt tax returns - any claim Reid lying?
McCain folk saw 23 years of Mitt's tax returns but have any of them said Reid is lying?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)that is the one person, or group that could at least feasibly deny it. Why haven't they?
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)lie to McCain.
railsback
(1,881 posts)Maybe he just showed him 23 years of financial disclosure statements, which he's now says is equivalent to tax returns. Romney refusing to release his tax returns to the public would be grounds enough for McCain, who's released numerous years, to not even consider Romney.
As secretive as Romney is, I seriously doubt he would show his tax returns to ANYONE.
jillan
(39,451 posts)That says alot!
spanone
(135,830 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)The McCain campaign knew Romney wasn't popular enough or a game changer and they knew they had to do something drastic. If you haven't had a change to watch Game Changer you should.
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)none that i've heard
UTUSN
(70,686 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Plus their bosses probably don't want Mitt's tax returns made public.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)More to the point, if the McCain folk DID see Romney's income tax forms, and there was nothing wrong with them, WHY HASN'T ANYONE SAID SO?
What if Mitt was rejected as VP not because of what was on his returns, BUT BECAUSE MITT REFUSED TO PRODUCE ANY?
rocktivity
rusty fender
(3,428 posts)there was nothing in Mitt's tax returns that would disqualify him from being President.
And, as someone pointed out above, perhaps Romney just showed the McCain campaign financial disclosure docs, not the actual returns. McCain may just assume that they were tax returns.
cr8tvlde
(1,185 posts)The quote ..."Everything was fine," McCain told reporters on Capitol Hill. "I can personally vouch for the fact that there was nothing in his tax returns that would in any way be disqualifying for him to be a candidate."
That could be factual with many of the scenarios floating around. Disqualifying is the operative term. What would be disqualifying would be fraud, failure to report, false addresses, etc. And I'm sure they didn't pore over them for days and days with the microscope, which it would have taken, because he was probably never seriously considered.
And since he was the sole everything at Bain, lots may have gone on as "business" which would not show up on personal returns.
McCain has a fall back position.