Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFormer President Clinton Blasts Romney’s ‘Disappointing’ New Welfare Claim: ‘That Is Not True’
Mitt Romney spent Tuesday on a media blitz claiming that President Obama is out to gut welfare reform. An ad released by the Romney campaign first pointed to President Clinton as having successfully reformed welfare, before excoriating Obama. However, in a statement, Clinton called Romneys charge against Obama disappointing and not true:
Governor Romney released an ad today alleging that the Obama administration had weakened the work requirements of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. That is not true. [...]
The recently announced waiver policy was originally requested by the Republican governors of Utah and Nevada to achieve more flexibility in designing programs more likely to work in this challenging environment. The Administration has taken important steps to ensure that the work requirement is retained and that waivers will be granted only if a state can demonstrate that more people will be moved into work under its new approach. The welfare time limits, another important feature of the 1996 act, will not be waived.
The Romney ad is especially disappointing because, as governor of Massachusetts, he requested changes in the welfare reform laws that could have eliminated time limits altogether. We need a bipartisan consensus to continue to help people move from welfare to work even during these hard times, not more misleading campaign ads.
In reality, the Obama administration is simply giving states the ability to experiment with new work programs, along the lines of a reform that Romney himself requested in 2005.
Governor Romney released an ad today alleging that the Obama administration had weakened the work requirements of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. That is not true. [...]
The recently announced waiver policy was originally requested by the Republican governors of Utah and Nevada to achieve more flexibility in designing programs more likely to work in this challenging environment. The Administration has taken important steps to ensure that the work requirement is retained and that waivers will be granted only if a state can demonstrate that more people will be moved into work under its new approach. The welfare time limits, another important feature of the 1996 act, will not be waived.
The Romney ad is especially disappointing because, as governor of Massachusetts, he requested changes in the welfare reform laws that could have eliminated time limits altogether. We need a bipartisan consensus to continue to help people move from welfare to work even during these hard times, not more misleading campaign ads.
In reality, the Obama administration is simply giving states the ability to experiment with new work programs, along the lines of a reform that Romney himself requested in 2005.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/08/08/656061/clinton-romney-welfare/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1691 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former President Clinton Blasts Romney’s ‘Disappointing’ New Welfare Claim: ‘That Is Not True’ (Original Post)
SunsetDreams
Aug 2012
OP
Maybe the Romney folks think they can get away with hit-and-run statements with Obama,
no_hypocrisy
Aug 2012
#2
greatauntoftriplets
(175,733 posts)1. I think that Rmoney pulled that one out of his arse.
no_hypocrisy
(46,088 posts)2. Maybe the Romney folks think they can get away with hit-and-run statements with Obama,
but they've made a serious mistake crossing Big Dawg.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)6. ha ha ha I think they thought they were
opening up a can of of worms but instead opened up....
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)7. William J Clinton Style!! nt
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)3. Looks like Romney is doubling down on this claim
and unleashing "The Newt' to support him on this: http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/gingrich-romney-rnc-welfare.php?ref=fpb
Looks like we might get a repeat of the 1990's skirmishes between Clinton and Gingrich. The only problem for Romney is that most of us (not him, apparently) know who won.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,834 posts)8. Newt "Drop the Pious Baloney" Gingrich is helping out Rmoney?
You lie down with dogs, you wake up on the car roof.
woofless
(2,670 posts)4. Be careful of what you ask for.
You might get it then have to oppose it as a matter of political expediancy.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)5. Great move, Mittwit. Big Dawg has not gone after your sorry butt
in the spirit of, well, something or other, in this campaign. You just smacked him across the face with your patrician's glove. Get ready for an ass-chewing, Mac.
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)10. .