Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEffort to slam Paul Manafort's accuser falls flat
https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/08/opinions/rick-gates-vs-paul-manafort-coates/index.htmlIn the history of criminal trials, no prosecutor has ever had the privilege of calling Mother Teresa as a witness. The existence of a perfect witness, void of credibility issues, or a proverbial skeleton in his or her closet is a pure fantasy.
Yet, the defense counsel in Paul Manafort's trial seems resolute in its efforts to discredit Rick Gates by painting him as an adulterous, immoral, unethical and corrupt liar in the hopes that the jury's disdain for his character will fatally undermine his credibility as a testifying witness. Good luck.
Do you know who testifies against pimps? Prostitutes. Do you know who testifies against drug dealers? Drug users. Do you know who testifies against conspirators? Their co-conspirators. In the imperfect contest of credibility, juries don't hear from the criminally pristine, they hear from two evils and choose to believe the lesser. In this case, the jury will choose between the admitted liar and the accused one.
Ever since Rick Gates entered into a plea agreement and formally agreed to cooperate with the Robert Mueller-led criminal probe into possible collusion between members of the Trump presidential campaign and Russia, the public has anticipated his testimony. They imagined the dramatic courtroom scene that would unfold as Manafort's right-hand man turned on him in the interests of self-preservation.
continued at link...
Editor's note: Laura Coates is a CNN legal analyst. She is a former assistant US attorney for the District of Columbia and trial attorney in the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice. She is the host of "The Laura Coates Show" on SiriusXM. Follow her @thelauracoates.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1224 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Effort to slam Paul Manafort's accuser falls flat (Original Post)
iluvtennis
Aug 2018
OP
Jarqui
(10,131 posts)1. They have too much other evidence
Too many others and too many documents that corroborate what Gates was saying.
There are actual emails written by Manafort that incriminate him - like to his son-in-law to present that they're living in one of his properties rather than it being rented to help him defraud a bank.
Manafort must be counting on a pardon from Trump
Leghorn21
(13,527 posts)2. - and this just in, luv!
Prosecutors will call 4-5 witnesses tomorrow including
Dennis Raico and James Brennan, both of whom were
granted immunity for testimony. Treasury's Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network analyst Paula Liss may also
be called back to provide more testimony.
4:42 PM - Aug 9, 2018
These two also have immunity - Donna Duggan, Conor O'Brien -
At any rate, tomorrow should be veddddy interesting!!
Dennis Raico and James Brennan, both of whom were
granted immunity for testimony. Treasury's Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network analyst Paula Liss may also
be called back to provide more testimony.
4:42 PM - Aug 9, 2018
Link to tweet
These two also have immunity - Donna Duggan, Conor O'Brien -
At any rate, tomorrow should be veddddy interesting!!
empedocles
(15,751 posts)3. Coates article perspective
very competent.
My guess if Manafort does not take the stand.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)4. It's about the only thing Manafort's attorneys can do: Attack the witnesses
Heaven knows the documentary evidence is heavily stacked against Manafort. Turns out his cunning financial maneuvers weren't quite cunning enough. The only thing Manafort has left is to impugn the witness who stole thousands from him while Manafort was stealing millions.
kacekwl
(7,024 posts)5. They were partners so ipso facto
if one is a cheating liar criminal then you know.