General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVirginia GOP Will Require Primary Voters To Sign Party Loyalty Oath
Pledges have become something of a fad in the Republican primary this year. Except for Jon Huntsman, the GOP hopefuls have all signed pledges to radical right-wing groups like the FAMiLY Leader promising to ban pornography and only appoint anti-abortion cabinet members and judges, among other things.
As the New York Times editorial board put it, It used to be that a sworn oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution was the only promise required to become president. But today, each pledge they sign undermines the basic principle of democratic government built on compromise and negotiation.
Now the Virginia GOP is extending the trend to voters, requiring them to sign a loyalty oath to the party before they are allowed to participate in the primary:
The state Republican Party will require voters to sign a loyalty oath in order to participate in the March 6 presidential primary.
Anyone who wants to vote must sign a form at the polling place pledging to support the eventual Republican nominee for president. Anyone who refuses to sign will be barred from voting in the primary.
During a brief meeting Wednesday at the state Capitol, the State Board of Elections voted 3-0 to approve three forms developed by the election boards staff to implement the loyalty pledge requested by the state GOP.
Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/01/03/396323/virginia-gop-will-require-primary-voters-to-sign-party-loyalty-oath/
I believe Hitler also required a loyalty oath.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)In the past, they were scared that Democrats will show up and vote.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Not that it would do any good, I mean, I could go in, sign a loyalty oath and then when it's time to vote, vote however I like. There's no way to enforce this but on top of all that, it doesn't seem like it's legal. It's kinda reminiscent of having to prove you can write to vote.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)Which it will be.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)follow them into the voting booth?
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)in a pile of dog doo.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)which makes it simply stupid.
onenote
(42,702 posts)particularly in open primary states. It seems to be mostly a southern thing -- I think South Carolina Democrats once had a loyalty oath requirement, as well as a few others.
Akoto
(4,266 posts)How can you legally coerce someone into voting a certain way, or else they'll be forbidden to vote? The ability to cast your vote is a right we all have.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Are they required to show IDs?
I want to be sure that every Republican who votes in the primaries is a real 'Murikan!!!
asjr
(10,479 posts)I can't believe this is legal.
dembotoz
(16,803 posts)could lead to ground breaking research on inbreeding.
MineralMan
(146,307 posts)you have to affirm that you support the DFL party before participating. It's part of the requirements for the caucuses, down to the precinct level.
It's not a primary election, but the requirement is still there. I don't know how it works in other states. In California, where I lived most of my adult life, primaries are done by party, so you had to be a registered Democrat to vote in partisan primary races. I know that's not the same thing, but...it's a declaration of party affiliation.
waddirum
(979 posts)With their oaths and pledges and loyalties and gossip. They are not worthy of an adult position like President of the United States.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)We demand loyalty to the party! What's next? Demanding everyone make certain gestures with their arms to publically indicate their loyalty?