Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan someone explain this?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/30/us/politics/abigail-spanberger-super-pac.htmlPostal Service Accepts Blame for Release of Candidates Security File, and Asks for It Back
The Postal Service on Thursday said it deeply regrets our mistake in inappropriately releasing the official personnel file of Abigail Spanberger, a former C.I.A. operative now running as Democratic candidate for Congress, and requested that a Republican-aligned super PAC return the file.
We take full responsibility for this unfortunate error, and we have taken immediate steps to ensure this will not happen again, David Partenheimer, a Postal Service spokesman, said in a statement. He added, The privacy and security of personal information is of utmost importance to the Postal Service. The Postal Service offers our sincere apology to Ms. Spanberger, and we will request the return of the information which we mistakenly disclosed.
The Postal Service also acknowledged the possibility of additional inappropriate disclosures.
We take full responsibility for this unfortunate error, and we have taken immediate steps to ensure this will not happen again, David Partenheimer, a Postal Service spokesman, said in a statement. He added, The privacy and security of personal information is of utmost importance to the Postal Service. The Postal Service offers our sincere apology to Ms. Spanberger, and we will request the return of the information which we mistakenly disclosed.
The Postal Service also acknowledged the possibility of additional inappropriate disclosures.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 961 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone explain this? (Original Post)
DURHAM D
Aug 2018
OP
Sounds like they did. I don't know what kind of screening postal inspectors get. n/t
rzemanfl
Aug 2018
#5
Ask for it back dumbass??? It has already been copied 50 times and passed around.
GemDigger
Aug 2018
#4
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)1. Sounds like a Trump stooge
was using USPS computer systems to hack government personnel files.
rzemanfl
(29,565 posts)2. From the article-
"The Congressional Leadership Fund made an issue of Ms. Spanbergers stint as a substitute teacher at the Islamic Saudi Academy in Alexandria, Va., when she was in her early 20s. At the time, Ms. Spanberger had been conditionally hired by the C.I.A., pending a background investigation. She went on to work in law enforcement for two years at the Postal Inspection Service before the C.I.A. officially hired her."
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)3. Does not seem like the Post Service should have ever had
her complete file.
Further.. why would they release anyone's info?
rzemanfl
(29,565 posts)5. Sounds like they did. I don't know what kind of screening postal inspectors get. n/t
GemDigger
(4,305 posts)4. Ask for it back dumbass??? It has already been copied 50 times and passed around.
unblock
(52,253 posts)6. the standard first step to limit damage is to ask for it to be returned and all copies destroyed.
it may not work to contain the damage, but you have to try.