Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The DNC had better insure that all voters have a voter ID in those states that require it. This (Original Post) still_one Aug 2012 OP
I agree with you. Think of all those seniors that don't have ejpoeta Aug 2012 #1
Wait..what? JNelson6563 Aug 2012 #2
What the Dems need to is reverse the Unconstitutional voter ID laws. Those laws are illegal GOPonziconz Aug 2012 #3
When we have absolute control, that "might" be possible, BUT SoCalDem Aug 2012 #4
We need to cover all bases. /nt still_one Aug 2012 #5

ejpoeta

(8,933 posts)
1. I agree with you. Think of all those seniors that don't have
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:30 PM
Aug 2012

the proper papers to get an id. The ryan pick may be bad one on the face of it, but that is why there are many states making it harder for seniors, college students and the poor to cast that vote.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
2. Wait..what?
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:51 PM
Aug 2012

Beyond promoting awareness of the voter ID requirements, what can the DNC do while also helping with literally hundreds of elections?

Do state and local parties bear any of the responsibility to inform and assist voters?

Julie

GOPonziconz

(38 posts)
3. What the Dems need to is reverse the Unconstitutional voter ID laws. Those laws are illegal
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:12 PM
Aug 2012

since the Constitution has NOT been changed and it guarantees Americans citizens the RIGHT to vote!

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
4. When we have absolute control, that "might" be possible, BUT
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:25 PM
Aug 2012

until then, we will lose "close" elections over and over until there is no possibility of ever GETTING control in the foreseeable future.

We are sniffing fairy-dust if we think the republicans will EVER stop trying to eliminate our voters.

We waste money & time at our own peril if we do not get ahead of them, and just get people the damned IDs in the FIRST place and then go to court/whine/stamp our feet/hold our breaths.

They are aggressive and relentless....they know the end result they want.. we are always in a defensive mode scrambling at the 11th hour trying to catch up.

They scrawled the handwriting on the wall (with bright red paint) in Nov-Dec 2000, so it's been TWELVE years now, and we are still reacting..

We either figure out a way to get ALL our voters iron-clad, drop-dead IDs so their eligibility is NEVER questioned again, or we continue to lose close (and desperately needed) elections.

If we EVER get back to an undisputed majority again (don't count on it anytime soon) we can "change the rules", but having valid IDs will certainly help people who did not have them, so for the "people" it's a win-win.

People who are anti ID, should resign themselves to never have a bank account, go to school, buy anything with a credit card, never buy a car or home or have a phone or much of anything. MOST of us are overly IDed already, and many are "trackable" by their phones & onStar.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The DNC had better insure...