Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Faygo Kid

(21,478 posts)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:59 PM Aug 2012

Here's two ways RR will go after those 55+. Just easy starts for them.

1. Raise the Medicare eligibility age, beginning immediately.

Move the needle, a month at a time. If you're, say, 64 and expect to get Medicare on your 65th birthday, they will try to add as little as one or as much as six months immediately. If you're 60, we're talking possibly a couple years.

2. This affects all current Social Security recipients: Implement the "chained CPI."

The "chained CPI" would recalculate the Consumer Price Index used to raise Social Security benefits so as to keep up with inflation to "account for consumer options." In other words, if consumers have bought beef, and that goes up in price, they assume consumers will simply change to chicken. If that goes up, then seniors can move to cat food. It's an insidious ploy to immediately reduce benefits to existing and future recipients. Actually, if there was an honest "senior CPI," Social Security benefits would go up in excess of general inflation, because seniors spend such a disproportionate share of their incomes on health care costs, which continue to explode.

These are just a couple modest moves to expect immediately that give lie to the "if you're over 55" claim. Of course, their ultimate goal is far more radical. Ayn Rand and her insane philosophy will destroy this country if they get in.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's two ways RR will go after those 55+. Just easy starts for them. (Original Post) Faygo Kid Aug 2012 OP
They will fuck you from any angle they want to..... RagAss Aug 2012 #1
SS has already been raised to 67 for everybody born after 1950 or so. they want to raise it to 70. HiPointDem Aug 2012 #2
I agree. I participated in a Focus Group and the upshot was that flamingdem Aug 2012 #3
they've heard 'social security is going bankrupt' for so long they think its a fact. never under- HiPointDem Aug 2012 #4
That's the crux of it, they push the - you're lucky if there's any left flamingdem Aug 2012 #5
they don't, obviously. maybe they'll bring back the poor farm, put 'em to work in the new urban HiPointDem Aug 2012 #6
gak! You might be on to something flamingdem Aug 2012 #7
yeah, all shiny & yuppified, decorated with pictures of shiny 'farm families' in their designer down HiPointDem Aug 2012 #10
Well let's look at the upside flamingdem Aug 2012 #13
yeah, like the old-time poor farm residents stayed in shape. i.e. they died young, but at least HiPointDem Aug 2012 #14
The +55 line is just to keep the seniors in line. CrispyQ Aug 2012 #8
Over 55 don’t worry be happy. They will not come for your social security after they devastate mine KILL THE WISE ONE Aug 2012 #9
i'm over 55, & i've been ringing this bell for a long time. why would you think that so long as we HiPointDem Aug 2012 #12
Not an attack on the over 55 crowd - just a reminder there is a bigger plan at work here KILL THE WISE ONE Aug 2012 #15
Here's a third way based on an analogy. At one time, Social Security benefits were not subject to AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #11
that's their game plan, chip away little by little til what's left bears no resemblance to the HiPointDem Aug 2012 #16
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
2. SS has already been raised to 67 for everybody born after 1950 or so. they want to raise it to 70.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:01 PM
Aug 2012

well, that should cut the cost considerable.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
3. I agree. I participated in a Focus Group and the upshot was that
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:07 PM
Aug 2012

and I was the only one in the group saying it's not fair.

Everyone else just shrugged and said they thought they'd have to work until they dropped anyway.

Americans are SHEEP on this one, or were.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
4. they've heard 'social security is going bankrupt' for so long they think its a fact. never under-
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:10 PM
Aug 2012

estimate the power of propaganda.

the democratic party should be making the counter-case, but for the most part theyre going along with the gop storyline.

'yes, there's a problem, we won't hurt you as much'

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
5. That's the crux of it, they push the - you're lucky if there's any left
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:14 PM
Aug 2012

idea to scare people.

One big problem: there are no jobs so how do they expect to keep people alive w/o SS before 70 or so?

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
6. they don't, obviously. maybe they'll bring back the poor farm, put 'em to work in the new urban
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:16 PM
Aug 2012

gardens to feed the yuppies.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
7. gak! You might be on to something
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:20 PM
Aug 2012

It will be prettied up -- nice Farmer's market workers!

Fetch me a bushel of arugula now! .. I see my future

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
10. yeah, all shiny & yuppified, decorated with pictures of shiny 'farm families' in their designer down
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:30 PM
Aug 2012

home cabins, while behind the scenes the 60-year-olds are hoeing the rows, along with the remnants of the urban poor and the prison chain gangs.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
13. Well let's look at the upside
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:53 PM
Aug 2012

at least we'll stay in shape!

And have access to organic vegetables, then again they'll probably really be sprayed with Paraquat, to save a few cents.

It is true that some fellow almost geezers have discussed living communally and off the land to lower costs. That was something I studied in school in Vermont in the late 70s. Communes! Most of them were pretty sketchy.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
14. yeah, like the old-time poor farm residents stayed in shape. i.e. they died young, but at least
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:55 PM
Aug 2012

they died skinny.

the wealthy were the fat ones in that era.

CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
8. The +55 line is just to keep the seniors in line.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:23 PM
Aug 2012

They'll find a way to steal it all. Every last fucking penny.

KILL THE WISE ONE

(1,120 posts)
9. Over 55 don’t worry be happy. They will not come for your social security after they devastate mine
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:24 PM
Aug 2012

After they divide us into 55 plus/minus, why would younger people work to support your “generous” benefits knowing, there will be nothing in it for us?

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
12. i'm over 55, & i've been ringing this bell for a long time. why would you think that so long as we
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:43 PM
Aug 2012

get ours we don't give a shit about anyone else?

the ruling class is an equal-opportunity destroyer.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
11. Here's a third way based on an analogy. At one time, Social Security benefits were not subject to
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:42 PM
Aug 2012

the federal income tax. Ronald Reagan, in addition to dramatically increasing the Social Security tax (while being given false publicity for allegedly lowering taxes), made 50% of the Social Security benefits subject to taxation under certain circumstances. Bill Clinton increased the percentage from 50% to 85%.

Under a third way, the Medicare payouts on behalf of Medicare recipients could be taxed to the Medicare recipients.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
16. that's their game plan, chip away little by little til what's left bears no resemblance to the
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 05:08 PM
Aug 2012

original & the program is ineffectual or actually harmful.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's two ways RR will g...