Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGrassley said, "We should have had an investigation"
The problem for him is that now an investigation is not timely for the corrupt party.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1203 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grassley said, "We should have had an investigation" (Original Post)
Equinox Moon
Sep 2018
OP
It was so telling to hear him actually say, an investigation would have been good.
Equinox Moon
Sep 2018
#2
Grassley, then SHS - tag team re should have had an investigation...it is the Dems fault
asiliveandbreathe
Sep 2018
#6
Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)1. Gee, ya think?
Of course, any real investigation would likely prove what a self-righteous prick Kavan-R really is.
Oh, well.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)2. It was so telling to hear him actually say, an investigation would have been good.
He was referring to a time frame during the summer months.
Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)5. Which gives him cover to "blame" the Dems for not bringing this up sooner.
Never underestimate the RW spin machine.
honest.abe
(8,678 posts)3. Wow.. he said that.
That seems significant although a bit late.
Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)8. Yes. It will be on the video feed. I might try to find it later.
CincyDem
(6,362 posts)4. Simple question - "what changed?"
If we "should have" then, what do we know now that says we shouldn't.
Here's the math: Kav is 54 I think (?) and his life expectancy is 80. Let's say he does average and stays on the court until he's 80.
25 years = 9,125 days.
How about we take 0.01% of those days...9 days....to be sure we have the right choice. Certainly, 0.01% won't make a different will it ?
Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)7. There you go using logic again...
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)6. Grassley, then SHS - tag team re should have had an investigation...it is the Dems fault
for not bringing the information sooner...totally rovian tactic...I'm rubber you 're glue....
repigs should have had an FBI investigation.....WH decline....slop around in your pig sty, that's all they got!!!!
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)9. Grassley is looking for someone to blame.
My guess is,yesterday he and his Staffers caught holy hell by his Constituents.
Watch as we go forward today,for Grassley to pin the blame on Trump via the use of the word President.