Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Northerner

(5,040 posts)
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 07:31 PM Jan 2012

U.S. says will continue to deploy warships in Persian Gulf despite Iranian threats

Pentagon U.S. ‘committed to security and stability of region’; State Department: Iran threats show economic sanctions begin to bite.

The United States will continue to deploy its warships in the Gulf, a defense spokesman said on Tuesday after Iran threatened to take action if the U.S. Navy moves an aircraft carrier into the Gulf.

"These are regularly scheduled movements and in accordance with our long-standing commitments to the security and stability of the region and in support of ongoing operations," Commander Bill Speaks said in an emailed response to Reuters questions.

"The U.S. Navy operates under international maritime conventions to maintain a constant state of high vigilance in order to ensure the continued, safe flow of maritime traffic in waterways critical to global commerce," he said.

Read more: http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-says-will-continue-to-deploy-warships-in-persian-gulf-despite-iranian-threats-1.405289


Isn't this type of behavior considered to be antagonism and world policing?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. says will continue to deploy warships in Persian Gulf despite Iranian threats (Original Post) The Northerner Jan 2012 OP
No, it is not antagonistic to not bow down to iranian threats. Muskypundit Jan 2012 #1
I think Iran has legitimate historical reasons to resent the US. mysuzuki2 Jan 2012 #2
The Straits of Hormuz is about 26 miles wide at its widest point... Old and In the Way Jan 2012 #3

Muskypundit

(717 posts)
1. No, it is not antagonistic to not bow down to iranian threats.
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 07:40 PM
Jan 2012

It's antagonistic to make those threats in the first place. We regularly have naval ships in the gulf, and have for many many years. We shouldn't stop just because Iran thinks we should. As long as we operate in the international waters Iran is in the wrong to threaten us.

mysuzuki2

(3,521 posts)
2. I think Iran has legitimate historical reasons to resent the US.
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 07:49 PM
Jan 2012

This being said however, the Persian Gulf is international waters and Iran is being very foolish to threaten the US' use of it. This kind of saber rattling is quite dangerous. Of course, you could also say the same thing about OUR saber rattling. I hope cool heads prevail on both sides!

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
3. The Straits of Hormuz is about 26 miles wide at its widest point...
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 08:29 PM
Jan 2012

is there a 12 mile international boundry there?


If so, that gives international shipping about a 2 mile channel to operate within. Seems pretty tight, unless the territory of Musandam is allowing shipping within their international boundry.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. says will continue t...