General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobert Reich weighs in on the SCOTUS debacle.....
"Each of the 4 Republican appointees to the Supreme Court have clouds of illegitimacy hanging over them:
1. Clarence Thomas: Not only Anita Hills highly-credible allegations of sexual harassment, but also Thomass repeatedly lies to the Senate Judiciary Committee about his views for example, saying he had no opinions on the constitutional rights to contraception and abortion even though he had written four different articles saying that Roe v. Wade and Griswold v. Connecticut were wrongly decided.
2. John Roberts: He participated in the decision Bush v. Gore, the first and only time in American history when the Supreme Court determined the outcome of a presidential election. Yet Roberts had been appointed by George W. Bush -- raising ongoing questions about his political neutrality in that case and in future ones.
3. Samuel Alito: Ditto.
4. Neil Gorsuch: He became a Supreme Court Justice because Senate Republicans refused to hold hearings or a vote on Merrick Garland for 293 days, the longest pending Supreme Court nomination in American history. No one questioned Garlands qualifications or even that he was a moderate. Never before had Senators held no hearing and no vote on a nominee because they hoped that their party would gain control of the presidency in the coming election.
If Kavanaugh gets on the Court, the majority of the Court will bear the tarnish of partisan illegitimacy, dividing America even further.
Your thoughts?"
Taken from "The Progressive Resistance" on Facebook.
GOTV!!!!
Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)standingtall
(2,787 posts)once Democrats get back both house and the Presidency they should expand the supreme court and then sure up their majority in the senate by giving all inhabited U.S. territories and D.C. statehood.
NorCen_CT
(176 posts)"One of his more controversial decisions came in 2010 when Chief Justice Roberts concurred with Justice Kennedy in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which declared that corporations have the same rights as average citizens engaging in political speech. Critics allege that the decision ignores the vast discrepancy between a corporation's finances and average citizen and destroys years of reform efforts to limit the power of special interest groups to influence the voters. Supporters hailed the decision as a boost for the First Amendment because campaign finance reform's efforts to force equality of free speech are contrary to protecting speech from government restraint. The ruling moved President Barack Obama to criticize the court's ruling during his 2010 State of the Union address and that, in turn, prompted Roberts to characterize Obama's choice of venue to criticize the court as "very troubling."
https://www.biography.com/people/john-roberts-20681147