General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDU votes Ronald Reagan over Hitler as the person they most want removed from history.
Sometimes this place can be dumber than a box of rocks.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1124572
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I mean, this is serious stuff. When someone goes ahead and invents that time machine, we're going to have to be ready.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,692 posts)Seriously, they did? Reagan was bad, but worse than Hitler? That's fucked up.
Bok_Tukalo
(4,323 posts)I removed Gustav Schäfer from history. The man was responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths in Europe.
When I got back, I learned of this Hitler guy .....
Freddie
(9,265 posts)And Democrats!
gollygee
(22,336 posts)because it seems obviously to be ridiculous.
BOG PERSON
(2,916 posts)if you take out christopher columbus, the discovery of the americas doesn't happen (ever!), there is no european mercantile era underwritten by the plunder of the americas and slavery, no colonization of asia and africa, no world war 1 over who's going to get what colonies, and no world war 2 over who's going to replace the british empire as top dog. how do you like that? i practically killed adam and eve.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)back the matriarchy, because men have had their chance and they sure have fucked up the planet
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)I skimmed down the thread but I didn't see many mentions of Reagan.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1119935
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)That purple fucker needs to die!!!
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Reagan, after all, deemed ketchup a vegetable, and did, after all, bring us Reaganomics, which we're still fighting ... but hey, what's 60 million people and a total realignment of the world compared to some bad tax and regulation laws?
Salviati
(6,008 posts)I mean otherwise it's kind of like posting a thread asking "What color do you think the sky is on a clear day?" and expecting to get a lively discussion.
Of course you're going to pick Hitler. Take Hitler out of the discussion, move on and discuss something interesting.
ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)But since he wasn't, I had to vote for the monster
crimson77
(305 posts)MANative
(4,112 posts)I'd have selected Prescott Bush. Would have solved many ills.
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)The death of Lincoln derailed Reconstruction and brought forward the era of Jim Crow.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)outcome of the election. There seems to be little sign that his influence is waning.
My vote is probably for Alexander Hamilton, though. It will be hundreds of years getting away from his worldview and machinations.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Mostly that the social and economic motivations for the rise of the Nazis would continue to exist even if Hitler was not their leader.
Also, arguably, Hitler screwed up and should have invaded Great Britain. It has been said that he was afraid of water and that his fear somehow made him to cautious. If you remove Hitler and have someone more capable rise to power things could be much worse. WWII was terrible but we did end up on the winning side. Are you sure you want to mess with that outcome?
Reagan is less risky. Also, we ended up on the wrong side of that fight.
P.S. I picked Abraham.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I've been watching that thread, and I was astounded. You, Trumad, have nailed the entire debacle on the head.