See if you can spot the difference between these two NYT headlines:

[kpete]

Link to tweet

[Cirque du So-What]

1. Damn you, librul media!

[Roland99]

3. That's what I said

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211453124

[UpInArms]

2. I like the pictures

One cast on a dark background and the other showing .... light and flags and ...

[deurbano]

25. Also, Ivanka is posing like a model in this staged photo, not captured in the middle of

gesturing and speaking, which is much more real, but doesn't look as flattering in a photo.

[Wounded Bear]

36. She's like her mom, she's always posing...

there is no 'natural' pose for them. They're always trying to be camera ready.

[Midnight Writer]

59. One cast as a victim and one cast as a criminal.

[Achilleaze]

4. republicans get a free freaking pass

Shame on the Times, which is making messes & muddles more and more. Do your job.

[calimary]

26. This is a good example to make note of.

Keep ‘em coming! They just prove our point. WHAT “liberal media”?

[Johnny2X2X]

5. It's now a crime

The laws were changed. What Hillary did was clearly not illegal, what Ivanka did was.

Headline should have been, “Ivanka caught commiting crime, should be indicted and arrested.”

[Pa-Kid]

6. I'm with you

She did the crime now she should do the time. Lock her up

[calimary]

28. What was that "phrase that pays" again?

Lock her up!!!

[3Hotdogs]

8. Was there an actual law change passed by Congress and signed by a presdident?

If so, I missed that.

[getagrip_already]

11. records retention act.....

It's a real law. There are also presidential directives ordering compliance.

[3Hotdogs]

12. Good.

[7962]

47. But laws dont apply to the Trumps. you should know that by now!!!

At least they think we should!

[Johnny2X2X]

18. FOIA Improvement Act of 2016

Signed by President Obama in June of 2016, makes it an actual crime to delete emails of government business. Once she started using her private email for government business she would not have been allowed to delete any emails off that server. Using a private email is against the rules, deleting any emails off that server would be a crime. So her entire email history off that server is accessible to the public via FOIA and if she has been found to have deleted a single email she is guilty of a crime. Even spam, or an email sent to her by mistake, or an old friend sending her a cupcake recipe. Click delete, you've committed a crime.

[IronLionZion]

13. Ivanka's lawyer claims she didn't break any laws

which law covers this? If she broke the law, then she should be prosecuted.

This sounds like it's blatantly wrong but not illegal.

[Roland99]

7. Heh. Here's another...

Link to tweet

[BSdetect]

10. But that is both sides are equal math surely? For dupes.

[calimary]

29. Yep. Another fine example.

Let’s keep track!

[GoCubsGo]

9. I hope somebody asks Lindsay Graham if he plans to investigate Ivanka's e-mails.

[ChiTownDenny]

40. Ah! Good point!

He's stated he wants more hearings.

[Honeycombe8]

14. And, when Hillary did it, it was against policy, but not against the law. It is NOW against the law.

Congress passed some bill after the Hillary thing, to make it clear that it's against the law or official rules or whatever, to do what she did. Before, it was general policy is all.

I should look up exactly what Congress did...but I don't have time right now. I just recall that they made the email thing official in some way, after the Hillary issue, to make it clear that it's serious & not optional.

[Johnny2X2X]

19. The FOIA Improvement Act of 2016

And the crime would be deleting any emails off the server after you have used that personal email for government business. This would extend to any emails she received or sent, who doesn't delete emails everyday?

The idea is that you can't delete anything off a government email server so the public can FOIA it. Once you use your private email you've not only violated the rules, but you've committed a crime if you've deleted a single email.

[ananda]

15. Nasty.

The NYT clearly has a rightwing bias.

[workinclasszero]

16. But..but...but..

Librual media on our side?

[dsc]

17. They did change the headline

but the first three paragraphs are at least as bad.

[lilactime]

20. Crap like this is why I stopped reading the NYT.

[Raven123]

33. Same here

I cancelled my NYT subscription during the campaign in 2008 for this nonsense. Nothing has changed

[Takket]

21. Translation...

When a Democrat MIGHT have done something wrong, they should be villified. If a rethug does something wrong, it is just an “excuse for Dems to whine even more than usual”.

the double standard is sickening.

[Autumn]

22. She unaware of the rules on using a private email? Did she live under a rock or a mushroom?

What the fuck did she think was daddy dearest reasons for the "Lock her up" mantra that gets him off?

[JudyM]

38. Bingo! And that's the basis for the start of her interrogation.

Have you heard your father calling for locking up HRC? How many times, approximately, including in person and in news coverage?
What did you understand to be the basis for that call?

“Under a mushroom”

[Autumn]

39. Yeah "Under a mushroom" just flowed from my fingers

[7962]

48. Oh lord. that took a minute to sink in. Ewwwwwwwwww

[Autumn]

50. Seriously. When I saw I had typed I washed my fingers in bleach

Last edited Tue Nov 20, 2018, 06:52 PM - Edit history (1)

[Control-Z]

57. Ewww.

I just got it. Yuk, yuk, yuk!!

[jayschool2013]

24. Headline at NYTimes.com now

Ivanka Trump Repeatedly Used Personal Email at White House, Review Finds

[Dopers_Greed]

27. It's sickening how the NYTimes has become propagandists for Trump

[Cosmocat]

30. T H I S is why we are where we are at

Media narratives, always slag dems ...

[flibbitygiblets]

31. Interesting timing for this:

[PeeJ52]

32. OMG.... IT'S TRUE!

Fox News .Com does not even have a story about it. Unbelievable... It'S not even news to them or they don't know how to spin it yet.

[7962]

49. It's now on their front page. They heard you!

Had to go look after you said that. Post time is an hour ago though.

[Texin]

34. Why do the mince around the violations where the Czar's family are concerned?

And while they're playing the "what about..." game, what about the old expression used by prosecutors and judges: Ignorance of the law (rules) is no defense for violating them. I've been baffled as to why the mainstream media are so hesitant to just flat out state in plain terms what those flagrant violations, broken laws, etc. are being abused in plain terms and not couched in euphemisms equivocations.

[lark]

35. this is the exact reason I no longer subscribe to NYT.

They have Clinton Derangement Syndrome and I'm so extremely sick of it.

[Gothmog]

37. The NYTwere assholes to Hillary Clinton on the e-mail story

[Firestorm49]

41. She must have been out shopping during the months that Clinton was attacked. Probably didn't know.

After all, she's a Trump.

[Pluvious]

42. Did you also see this...

Link to tweet

[ffr]

54. This!

Good point.

[dlk]

43. It's Always Been the Conservative Media-Why Not Refer to It That Way?

[Byte606]

44. NY Times devolves into corporate mouthpiece

Excellent post. The NYTimes is a pathetic shell of its former self.

[RainCaster]

45. The MSM and their fucking equivalence doctrine

One is not the same as the other. After DFT and the GOP made such a big damn deal of it in the 2016 election, you would think Ivanka knew better.

[BlueInRedHell]

46. Schmidt and Haberman are two of the reasons that IDGAD about the NY Times. r/o

Their reporting is just *not* relevant.

[still_one]

51. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[Cha]

52. FUCK YOU TOOL, NYT

[Prof.Higgins]

53. Michael Schmidt and similar "Correspondents" waste our time on MSNBC also. Ugh. nt

[NoMoreRepugs]

55. NYT is not what it once was.

[barbtries]

56. wow how transparent is that.

as the trumps and the #GOPTraitors destroy the country.

[C Moon]

58. That's because the Clinton version was a paid ad, run by Putin and his rich comrades.

[True Blue American]

60. So Michael thinks

It was just fine to threaten Hillary with jail as Trump did but it will be Democrats taking revenge investigating Ivanka doing the same?

Yeah, Right!