General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News legal analyst stunned at how Mueller made it impossible for Trump to save Manafort
On Tuesday, Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano revealed to host Shep Smith that Special Counsel Robert Mueller acted strategically to block President Donald Trump from pardoning Paul Manafort.
Manafort, Trumps former campaign manager, was busted for lying even after he signed a plea agreement.
It is unclear exactly what he lied about, but Napolitano explained that Mueller designed the plea agreement in such a way that it is pardon proof.
More:
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/fox-news-legal-analyst-stunned-at-how-mueller-made-it-impossible-for-trump-to-save-manafort/?utm_source=push_notifications
OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)Jim__
(14,075 posts)Mueller trumped Trump's power.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,785 posts)That even Andrew Napolitano recognized. Trump is fucked so to speak because any move to pardon Manafort will be Obstruction of Justice that even the DOJ will have to acknowledge.
AndJusticeForSome
(537 posts)Mueller just did his job Manafort's the one who committed State crimes.
(Not belittling Mueller in any way, of course; just pointing out Manafort's role.)
Corvo Bianco
(1,148 posts)And not necessarily a 'win' like Mueller's on offense.
malaise
(268,993 posts)Lock them all up!
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)everyone thought they would be dealing with a Jimmy Boombatz, because thats all they know.
True Dough
(17,304 posts)when Donny is incapable of even playing tiddlywinks.
Lochloosa
(16,064 posts)True Dough
(17,304 posts)but a simple concept to grasp, for most people, at least.
SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Commonly called a scam...in real estate. Same for casinos...cashes in his chips just before the House burns down. Sayonara !!
BootinUp
(47,144 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Mueller is a Republican but he stands by our Democracy
pwb
(11,263 posts)pecosbob
(7,538 posts)I think they are positioning themselves for some sort of quarterback sneak or change in tactics.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)Napolitano, I agree, while pro Trump and pro GOP, has generally been a straight shooter on legal issues, though from a GOP perspective.
rurallib
(62,414 posts)As the wise Yogi (Berra) once stated "It ain't over til it's over."
Goodness knows Fox is on the team and will do anything for a "win."
pecosbob
(7,538 posts)One of my favorite ballplayers of all time...the player Casey Stengel said he couldn't win a game without.
Perseus
(4,341 posts)What Dershowitz said was that the report would be devastating, but that at the end of the day everyone would see that it was nothing but a political attack on the president. Dershowitz used his years as a lawyer to try to transform the validity of the Muller probe results into nothing but a political hack job.
Dershowitz is a clown who should be fired from Harvard University, if he is teaching what he is advocating on TV then he is teaching treason, and disregard for the rule of law. How many times has he called for the end of the Muller probe?
LiberalFighter
(50,921 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)allgood33
(1,584 posts)And i hope that the alleged meeting between Assange and Manifest can be proven with tapes and videos. Most embassies tape every damn thing.
Jarqui
(10,124 posts)including Trump
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)It's almost as if Mueller knows what he's doing.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)the law.
mastermind
(229 posts)were in collusion and are lying. tRrump is the main target, Manafort is the means to put that target in prison.
The_jackalope
(1,660 posts)If true, they would constitute proof that Manafort committed perjury and Trump committed conspiracy to obstruct justice.
Everybody dance!
How are these tRump supporters going to react as they see their hero taken in custody? And his offspring?
Hope he loses every nickel he has and claimed to have.
mastermind
(229 posts)it was all created by the corporate media to increase profits, his presidency is one big, bad reality show.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)knuckledraggers. 80% retired military; the jerk two doors down still drives around with a *huge* tRump bumper sticker. They all have been in denial.
gay texan
(2,443 posts)It's that simple
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)Thanks for posting! This is great!
Stinky The Clown
(67,798 posts)Like everyone, I hope this is true. That said, I'm thinking presidential pardon power is pretty much unlimited.
On edit, it seems Paulie also pleaded to state crimes which, indeed, are beyond the reach of Trump's pardon power. So pardoning the federal charges just moves Paulie from Club Fed to a prison in Joisey witta buncha skinheads and homeboys. And may a couple of Mafioso types, which are more to Paulie's liking, I'd guess.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)or was in Virginia/DC?
onenote
(42,701 posts)that will protect Manafort unless its changed (and even if its changed, the change probably wouldn't be given retroactive effect).
https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2018/08/23/bill-to-close-so-called-double-jeopardy-loophole-would-not-affect-manafort-cohen/?slreturn=20181027110842
Sugarcoated
(7,724 posts)Does anyone know?
FreeState
(10,572 posts)plea agreement. Meaning there is no double jeopardy.
onenote
(42,701 posts)Show me where he did.
You can't.
Because he didn't.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)Second, Mueller managed to get concessions from Manafort that limit the value of any pardon. Manafort admitted guilt on virtually all of the charges he faced in both Washington, D.C., and Virginia, including a slew of bank fraud charges. Each of those admissions could give state or local prosecutors a potential charge against Manafort that would survive even in the event of a Trump pardon, since he can pardon only federal offenses
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/14/manafort-probe-russia-trump-pardon-825751
Article from 9/14/2018
onenote
(42,701 posts)FreeState
(10,572 posts)onenote
(42,701 posts)Sorry if you missed that.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Az_lefty
(3,670 posts)TeamPooka
(24,225 posts)Not good.
Club Fed with other rich criminals is the way to go.
SayItLoud
(1,702 posts)which deals with double jeopardy? Maybe ManaFART feels that tRUMP and the RePUBICs stacking the court with conservers will rule in their favor. However since ManaFART has pled guilty to those State crimes maybe his goose is cooked. Nope someone on DU can explain what's going on with this case.
onenote
(42,701 posts)First, there is no 175 page plea agreement. The relevant documents include:
The Plea Agreement, which is 17 pages.
The Statement of Offense and Other Charges, which is 24 pages.
The Superseding Information, which is 38 pages plus another 38 pages of attachments.
Under the plea agreement, Manafort pleaded guilty to two counts, which cover most of the Statement of Offense. He also admitted to the "other charges" in the Statement of Offense, which are the same seven charges of bank fraud and bank fraud conspiracy that he was tried on in the Eastern District case, but the jury couldn't reach a verdict.
There is nothing else. And under New York law, anything he plead guilty to or was even tried for cannot be the basis of a new state trial. Even if Trump pardons him. (And you can bet your bottom dollar that if Trump pardons Manafort, the pardon will cover the 8 counts he was convicted of in Virginia, the two counts he pleaded guilty to in DC and the 7 counts that he was tried on but not convicted of in Virginia but admitted to in DC).
I don't think its impossible for Trump to pardon everything and anything he can think of and, at least as far as New York (and maybe some other states), it's game over. Indeed, ever since last spring, there has been an effort, thus far unsuccessful, to change New York law because at the moment, it would prevent Manafort from facing state charges based on the actions that formed the basis of the federal charges.
Nevilledog
(51,102 posts)Present New York law would only prevent successive prosecution for the exact same crime using the same evidence as the federal crime.
onenote
(42,701 posts)Of course they can prosecute Manafort for crimes that are factually distinct from the ones covered by the plea agreement with Mueller (or from the convictions in the Eastern District).
But the issue is whether Manafort has "confessed" to criminal activity that he hasn't been charged with and whether he can be charged in New York. The answer is that his plea agreement only "confesses" to actions covered by the prosecutions brought by Mueller in ED VA or DC. Under NY's broad double jeopardy law, he cannot be prosecuted for state crimes based on those actions.
Nevilledog
(51,102 posts)I also disagree that NY is barred from prosecuting Manafort for the state crimes he admitted to in the plea proceedings. He wasn't convicted of those crimes in any jurisdiction in the plea he entered. Think of it this way...... John Doe enters a plea in Federal Court to one count of theft. During the plea he also admits to committing 10 different thefts in NY. Unless the plea specifically states that Doe cannot be prosecuted for those thefts pursuant to an agreement between the Feds, NY, and the defendant, those crimes are still prosecutable. The Feds cannot vitiate the State's power to prosecute someone for crimes within their jurisdiction, and have no power to negotiate away crimes that are not solely federal crimes. Worse case scenario, in my opinion, would be that NY might be precluded from using the statements attributed to Manafort at his change of plea. This would allow NY to use the rest of their evidence to convict him.
onenote
(42,701 posts)Including the previous and current New York Attorney Generals.
https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2018/08/23/bill-to-close-so-called-double-jeopardy-loophole-would-not-affect-manafort-cohen/?slreturn=20181027210221
Nevilledog
(51,102 posts)Sugarcoated
(7,724 posts)I hope it isn't causing him to speculate too optimistically
getagrip_already
(14,750 posts)Until/unless the gop senators abandon him, he will be potus until 2021, even if he is tried and convicted. The constitution is clear. The only way to forcibly remove him is impeachment and conviction.
And we need 67 senators for that. I very much doubt we can get ~19 of them no matter what happens.
It will be one hell of a ride. Buckle up. Don't eat a greasy dinner. You may end up blowing chunks by the time this is in the rear view mirror.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)But, I was around during Watergate. Nixon got busted by his own party...fearful for their re-election. Seemed he preferred to go out in resignation rather than be shoved out. But the writing was already on the wall.
I don't remember if they had the votes to impeach, but they had the political pressure to carry it out.
How far are we from this, assuming that the economy goes south, the tariffs gut the Midwest, and the military tires of being his plastic play toys.
getagrip_already
(14,750 posts)That was the stick, Ford issuing the pardon was the carrot.
It was a very different Congress.
Trump will only resign if he can make it look like he won. He can try to pardon himself, the doh can grant him absolute immunity, or he can high tail it to a country that will shelter him.
But before he goes, he is going to hurt us very badly. Maybe he will pardon all white federal inmates. Who knows.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)After all, that's the sole reason this underqualified Trump loyalist was shoved into office before Sessions' chair was cold.
LudwigPastorius
(9,140 posts)Hey, Pauly! You better ask Santa to bring you this book for Christmas.