Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums14 AGs join Maryland AG suit challenging legality of Whitaker's appt.
https://www.jurist.org/news/2018/11/15-ags-file-brief-opposing-whitaker-as-us-ag/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 465 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
14 AGs join Maryland AG suit challenging legality of Whitaker's appt. (Original Post)
triron
Nov 2018
OP
MiniMe
(21,714 posts)1. Wow, Maine and North Carolina surprise me
The rest I'd expect.
Maryland and The amicus brief was filed by Attorney General Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania and Attorney General Karl Racine of Washington, DC. The attorneys general from Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia and Washington also joined in the brief.
triron
(22,001 posts)2. Great NM is in there!
roamer65
(36,745 posts)3. Michigan will be onboard after January 1.
Our first LGBT attorney general, Dana Nessel.
Hekate
(90,674 posts)4. Excellent. I look forward to California joining in. nt
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,342 posts)5. "novel and exceedingly strange"
From the article:
The states argue that the Department of Justices November 14 memo is incorrect, stating that the Vacancies Reform Act cannot be used as an alternative method of appointing an acting head of the Department of Justice. Even though the Vacancies Reform Act does not expressly state that the act cannot be used if another statute remains in effect, the brief argues it should not have to. The brief also calls the memos theory novel and exceedingly strange. Instead, the attorney general succession statute is the only way that an acting Attorney General can be appointed.